Comparison of two pathological processing methods for large endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) specimens

Zixiang Yu,Dongxian Jiang,Wen Huang,Rongkui Luo,Haixing Wang,Jieakesu Su,Jia Liu,Chen Xu,Yingyong Hou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2022-208491
2022-09-05
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Abstract:Aims Accurate histopathological evaluation of the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) specimens is essential for clinicians to guide further triage and management. This study aimed to report a novel processing technique for large ESD (≥4 cm) specimens. Methods 92 patients with colorectal neoplasms who had undergone ESD were included. 46 ESD specimens were treated with conventional handling process, while the rest 46 cases were given the optimised method. Macrobiocassettes and L-shaped embedding moulds were applied in the optimised method. We evaluated the efficacy of this improved procedure in terms of the number of paraffin blocks, storage space and time consumption of pathological assessment. Results The average diameter of ESD specimens was 4.5±0.4 cm and 4.7±0.5 cm in the control and test group (p=0.023), respectively. In control group, 398 paraffin blocks of 46 cases were obtained. With the same cases number and larger lesion size, only 276 blocks were achieved in test group (p<0.001). As for the storage space, the total volume of paraffin blocks and slides (4554.0 cm 3 and 1207.5 cm 3 ) of optimised method was significantly reduced compared with the control group (6208.8 cm 3 and 1741.3 cm 3 ) (p=0.001, p<0.001). In addition, the optimised method was superior to the conventional one in shortening time consumption of pathological assessment (164.5 min and 269.0 min, p<0.001). Conclusions The optimised technique not only reduced the workload and storage space, but also facilitated accurate pathological assessment.
pathology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?