Formation Mechanism of Ammonium Carbamate for CO 2 Uptake in N , N ′-Dimethylethylenediamine Grafted M 2 (dobpdc)

Hui Zhang,Li-Ming Yang,Eric Ganz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02750
IF: 3.9
2020-11-10
Langmuir
Abstract:The adsorption properties and formation mechanism of ammonium carbamate for CO<sub>2</sub> capture in <i>N,N</i>′-dimethylethylenediamine (mmen) grafted M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc) (dobpdc<sup>4–</sup> = 4,4′-dioxidobiphenyl-3,3′-dicarboxylate; M = Mg, Sc–Zn, except Ni) have been studied via density functional theory (DFT) calculations. We see that the mmen molecule is joined to the metal site via a M–N bond and has hydrogen bonding with neighboring mmen molecules. The binding energies of mmen range from 135.4 to 184.0 kJ/mol. CO<sub>2</sub> is captured via insertion into the M–N bond of mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc), forming ammonium carbamate. The CO<sub>2</sub> binding energies (35.2 to 92.2 kJ/mol) vary with different metal centers. Furthermore, the Bader charge analysis shows that the CO<sub>2</sub> molecules acquire 0.42 to 0.47 |<i>e|</i>. This charge is mainly contributed by the mmen, and a small additional amount is from the metal atom bonded with the CO<sub>2</sub>. The preferred reaction pathway is a two-step reaction. In the first step, the hydrogen bonded complex B changes into an N-coordinated intermediate D with high barriers (0.69 to 1.58 eV). The next step involves the translation and rotation of the chain in the intermediate D, resulting in the formation of the final O-coordinated product I with barriers of 0.22 to 0.61 eV. The higher barriers of CO<sub>2</sub> reaction with mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc) relative to attack the primary amine might be due to the larger steric hindrance of mmen. We hope this work will contribute to an improved understanding and development of future amine-grafted materials for efficient CO<sub>2</sub> capture.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02750?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02750</a>.The calculated energies of NM, FM and AFM states, magnetic moments, lattice parameters, unit cell volumes for bare M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc), mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc) and CO<sub>2</sub>–mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc), the optimized structure of pair model for CO<sub>2</sub>–mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc), the mmen binding energies and the M–N bonds lengths in mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc), CO<sub>2</sub> binding energies in chain model and pair model of CO<sub>2</sub>–mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc) and the O–M bonds lengths in chain model, the Bader net charge of each metal in the unit cell of bare M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc), mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc) and CO<sub>2</sub>–mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc), the Bader net charge of mmen in mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc), and mmen, CO<sub>2</sub> and MOF framework in CO<sub>2</sub>–mmen–M<sub>2</sub>(dobpdc), the IRC curves of TS<sub>1</sub> and illustrative structures of selected points along the IRC, the energy profiles of different images during CI–NEB calculations, the relative energies of each species and reaction barriers along reaction pathways, the optimized geometry structures and corresponding coordinates files (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02750/suppl_file/la0c02750_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, multidisciplinary, physical,materials science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?