Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 11, Issue 3_suppl2, March 2023. Objectives:To develop machine learning algorithms to predict failure of surgical procedures that address cartilage defects of the knee and detect the most valuable variables associated with failure.Methods:A single institution prospectively collected database of cartilage procedures was queried for procedures performed between 2000 and 2018. Failure was defined as revision cartilage surgery and/or knee arthroplasty. One hundred and one preoperative and intraoperative features were evaluated as potential predictors. The dataset was randomly divided into training (70%) and independent testing (30%) sets. Four machine learning algorithms were trained and internally validated. Algorithm performance was assessed using area under curve (AUC) and the Brier score. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) was utilized to assess the optimized algorithm fidelity.Results:A total of 1091 patients who underwent surgical procedures addressing cartilage defects in the knee with a minimum of 2-years of follow-up were included. The mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 2.8 years. The mean age was 40.5 ± 15 years. There were 205 (18.8%) patients who failed at final follow-up. The Random Forest algorithm was found to be the best performing algorithm, with an AUC of 0.765 and a Brier score of 0.135. The 10 most important features for predicting failure following surgical procedures addressing cartilage defects of the knee were: symptom duration, age, body mass index (BMI), lesion grade, total lesion area (sum of all lesion areas), number of previous surgeries, number of lesions in the knee, gender, athletic level, and traumatic etiology. LIME analysis allowed for assessment of the optimized algorithm fidelity, as well as provided a patient-specific comparison for the risk of failure of an individual patient being assigned various types of cartilage procedures.Conclusions:Machine learning algorithms were accurate in predicting the risk of failure following cartilage procedures of the knee, with the most important features being symptom duration, age, BMI, lesion grade, and total lesion area. Machine learning algorithms may be used to compare the risk of failure of specific patient-procedure combinations in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee. Integrated human and machine learning decision-making may improve patient selection and bring about the new era of patient-tailored evidence-based clinical care.Table 1.Demographic and Clinical Characteristics.Table 2.Prior surgical procudures.Figure 1.Global feature importance plot displaying (in a descending order) the most important predictors of failure following surgical procedures addressing cartilage defects of the knee.Figure 2.A-D. The Corresponding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the four algorithms. A. Elastic-net penalized linear regression (ENPLR, AUC=0.725); B. Random Forest (AUC=0.765); C. Neural Network (AUC=0.742); D. XG Boost (AUC=0.757).

Ensemble Algorithm for Risk Prediction of Clinical Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

A Systematic Approach to Predicting the Risk of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision.

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Graft Failure and Contralateral ACL Injuries After Primary ACL Reconstruction: An Analysis of Risk Factors Using Interpretable Machine Learning

Preoperative knee hyperextension is the most relevant predictor for ACL reconstruction objective failure: a machine learning analysis of 680 patients

A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort

Paper 19: Evidence-Based Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Failure Following Cartilage Preservation Procedures in the Knee

The Clinical Application of Machine Learning Models for Risk Analysis of Ramp Lesions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Unsupervised Machine Learning of the Combined Danish and Norwegian Knee Ligament Registers: Identification of 5 Distinct Patient Groups With Differing ACL Revision Rates

Developing a Machine‐Learning Predictive Model for Retention of Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Prognosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: A Data Driven Approach

Mid-to-long Term Clinical Outcomes and Predictors after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Re-Vision

Femoral Tunnel Malposition, Increased Lateral Tibial Slope, and Decreased Notch Width Index are Risk Factors for Non-Traumatic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure

Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Prospective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft

External validation of the Norwegian anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revision prediction model using patients from the STABILITY 1 Trial

Prediction of 30-Day Mortality Following Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Machine Learning Algorithms Outperform CARDE-B, 5-Item, and 6-Item Modified Frailty Index Risk Scores

Risk Prediction Model for Knee Arthroplasty

Predicting the Recovery of Isokinetic Knee Strength 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Methodology and development of a machine learning probability calculator: Data heterogeneity limits ability to predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair

Early ACLR and Risk and Timing of Secondary Meniscal Injury Compared With Delayed ACLR or Nonoperative Treatment: A Time-to-Event Analysis Using Machine Learning