Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 11, Issue 3_suppl2, March 2023. Objectives:To develop machine learning algorithms to predict failure of surgical procedures that address cartilage defects of the knee and detect the most valuable variables associated with failure.Methods:A single institution prospectively collected database of cartilage procedures was queried for procedures performed between 2000 and 2018. Failure was defined as revision cartilage surgery and/or knee arthroplasty. One hundred and one preoperative and intraoperative features were evaluated as potential predictors. The dataset was randomly divided into training (70%) and independent testing (30%) sets. Four machine learning algorithms were trained and internally validated. Algorithm performance was assessed using area under curve (AUC) and the Brier score. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) was utilized to assess the optimized algorithm fidelity.Results:A total of 1091 patients who underwent surgical procedures addressing cartilage defects in the knee with a minimum of 2-years of follow-up were included. The mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 2.8 years. The mean age was 40.5 ± 15 years. There were 205 (18.8%) patients who failed at final follow-up. The Random Forest algorithm was found to be the best performing algorithm, with an AUC of 0.765 and a Brier score of 0.135. The 10 most important features for predicting failure following surgical procedures addressing cartilage defects of the knee were: symptom duration, age, body mass index (BMI), lesion grade, total lesion area (sum of all lesion areas), number of previous surgeries, number of lesions in the knee, gender, athletic level, and traumatic etiology. LIME analysis allowed for assessment of the optimized algorithm fidelity, as well as provided a patient-specific comparison for the risk of failure of an individual patient being assigned various types of cartilage procedures.Conclusions:Machine learning algorithms were accurate in predicting the risk of failure following cartilage procedures of the knee, with the most important features being symptom duration, age, BMI, lesion grade, and total lesion area. Machine learning algorithms may be used to compare the risk of failure of specific patient-procedure combinations in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee. Integrated human and machine learning decision-making may improve patient selection and bring about the new era of patient-tailored evidence-based clinical care.Table 1.Demographic and Clinical Characteristics.Table 2.Prior surgical procudures.Figure 1.Global feature importance plot displaying (in a descending order) the most important predictors of failure following surgical procedures addressing cartilage defects of the knee.Figure 2.A-D. The Corresponding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the four algorithms. A. Elastic-net penalized linear regression (ENPLR, AUC=0.725); B. Random Forest (AUC=0.765); C. Neural Network (AUC=0.742); D. XG Boost (AUC=0.757).

Methodology and development of a machine learning probability calculator: Data heterogeneity limits ability to predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair

Development and training of a machine learning algorithm to identify patients at risk for recurrence following an arthroscopic Bankart repair (CLEARER): protocol for a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study

A Systematic Approach to Predicting the Risk of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision.

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Machine Learning Did Not Outperform Conventional Competing Risk Modeling to Predict Revision Arthroplasty

Risk Factors for Recurrence Following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair – A Systematic

A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort

Long-term Effectiveness and Outcome-Determining Factors of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recreational Sports Population: An Assessment of 100 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 12.7 Years

Graft Failure and Contralateral ACL Injuries After Primary ACL Reconstruction: An Analysis of Risk Factors Using Interpretable Machine Learning

Ensemble Algorithm for Risk Prediction of Clinical Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Instability Severity Index Score predicts recurrent shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair

Mid-term to long-term results of primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a retrospective study

Paper 19: Evidence-Based Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Failure Following Cartilage Preservation Procedures in the Knee

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Conservative Treatment for First-Time Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry

[Arthroscopic Bankart Repair with Suture Anchors: Results and Risk Factors of Recurrence of Instability].

Comparing Recurrence Rates and the Cost-Effectiveness of Arthroscopic Labral Repair and Nonoperative Management for Primary Anterior Shoulder Dislocations in Young Patients: A Decision-Analytic Markov Model-Based Analysis

Is Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair a Viable Option? A Systematic Review of Recurrent Instability following Bankart Repair

Preoperative knee hyperextension is the most relevant predictor for ACL reconstruction objective failure: a machine learning analysis of 680 patients

Developing a Machine‐Learning Predictive Model for Retention of Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Machine learning model outperforms the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non‐home discharge following primary total knee arthroplasty