MARS Group,Kinjal Vasavada,Vrinda Vasavada,Jay Moran,Sai Devana,Changhee Lee,Sharon L. Hame,Laith M. Jazrawi,Orrin H. Sherman,Laura J. Huston,Amanda K. Haas,Christina R. Allen,Daniel E. Cooper,Thomas M. DeBerardino,Kurt P. Spindler,Michael J. Stuart,Annunziato (Ned) Amendola,Christopher C. Annunziata,Robert A. Arciero,Bernard R. Bach,Champ L. Baker,Arthur R. Bartolozzi,Keith M. Baumgarten,Jeffrey H. Berg,Geoffrey A. Bernas,Stephen F. Brockmeier,Robert H. Brophy,Charles A. Bush-Joseph,J. Brad Butler V,James L. Carey,James E. Carpenter,Brian J. Cole,Jonathan M. Cooper,Charles L. Cox,R. Alexander Creighton,Tal S. David,Warren R. Dunn,David C. Flanigan,Robert W. Frederick,Theodore J. Ganley,Charles J. Gatt,Steven R. Gecha,James Robert Giffin,Jo A. Hannafin,Norman Lindsay Harris,Keith S. Hechtman,Elliott B. Hershman,Rudolf G. Hoellrich,David C. Johnson,Timothy S. Johnson,Morgan H. Jones,Christopher C. Kaeding,Ganesh V. Kamath,Thomas E. Klootwyk,Bruce A. Levy,C. Benjamin Ma,G. Peter Maiers,Robert G. Marx,Matthew J. Matava,Gregory M. Mathien,David R. McAllister,Eric C. McCarty,Robert G. McCormack,Bruce S. Miller,Carl W. Nissen,Daniel F. O’Neill,Brett D. Owens,Richard D. Parker,Mark L. Purnell,Arun J. Ramappa,Michael A. Rauh,Arthur C. Rettig,Jon K. Sekiya,Kevin G. Shea,James R. Slauterbeck,Matthew V. Smith,Jeffrey T. Spang,Steven J. Svoboda,Timothy N. Taft,Joachim J. Tenuta,Edwin M. Tingstad,Armando F. Vidal,Darius G. Viskontas,Richard A. White,James S. Williams,Michelle L. Wolcott,Brian R. Wolf,Rick W. Wright,James J. York

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 11, November 2024. Background:As machine learning becomes increasingly utilized in orthopaedic clinical research, the application of machine learning methodology to cohort data from the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) presents a valuable opportunity to translate data into patient-specific insights.Purpose:To apply novel machine learning methodology to MARS cohort data to determine a predictive model of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) graft failure and features most predictive of failure.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The authors prospectively recruited patients undergoing rACLR from the MARS cohort and obtained preoperative radiographs, surgeon-reported intraoperative findings, and 2- and 6-year follow-up data on patient-reported outcomes, additional surgeries, and graft failure. Machine learning models including logistic regression (LR), XGBoost, gradient boosting (GB), random forest (RF), and a validated ensemble algorithm (AutoPrognosis) were built to predict graft failure by 6 years postoperatively. Validated performance metrics and feature importance measures were used to evaluate model performance.Results:The cohort included 960 patients who completed 6-year follow-up, with 5.7% (n = 55) experiencing graft failure. AutoPrognosis demonstrated the highest discriminative power (model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: AutoPrognosis, 0.703; RF, 0.618; GB, 0.660; XGBoost, 0.680; LR, 0.592), with well-calibrated scores (model Brier score: AutoPrognosis, 0.053; RF, 0.054; GB, 0.057; XGBoost, 0.058; LR, 0.111). The most important features for AutoPrognosis model performance were prior compromised femoral and tibial tunnels (placement and size) and allograft graft type used in current rACLR.Conclusion:The present study demonstrated the ability of the novel AutoPrognosis machine learning model to best predict the risk of graft failure in patients undergoing rACLR at 6 years postoperatively with moderate predictive ability. Femoral and tibial tunnel size and position in prior ACLR and allograft use in current rACLR were all risk factors for rACLR failure in the context of the AutoPrognosis model. This study describes a unique model that can be externally validated with larger data sets and contribute toward the creation of a robust rACLR bedside risk calculator in future studies.Registration:NCT00625885 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry

A Systematic Approach to Predicting the Risk of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision.

Machine Learning Did Not Outperform Conventional Competing Risk Modeling to Predict Revision Arthroplasty

Prediction of Early Adverse Events After THA: A Comparison of Different Machine-Learning Strategies Based on 262,356 Observations From the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) Dataset

Prediction of 30-Day Mortality Following Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Machine Learning Algorithms Outperform CARDE-B, 5-Item, and 6-Item Modified Frailty Index Risk Scores

The utility of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of patient-reported outcome measures following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty

Machine Learning Prediction Model to Predict Length of Stay of Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasties: Results from a High-Volume Single-Center Multivariate Analysis

Predicting 30-day unplanned hospital readmission after revision total knee arthroplasty: machine learning model analysis of a national patient cohort

Artificial Intelligence Models Are Limited in Predicting Clinical Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review

Predicting extended hospital stay following revision total hip arthroplasty: a machine learning model analysis based on the ACS-NSQIP database

Supervised machine learning for the prediction of post‐operative clinical outcomes of hip and knee replacements: a review

Applying models of care for total hip and knee arthroplasty: External validation of a published predictive model to identify extended stay risk prior to lower-limb arthroplasty

Development of Machine-Learning Algorithms to Predict Attainment of Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Yield Fair Performance and Limited Clinical Utility

Prediction model for an early revision for dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty

Predicting prolonged length of stay following revision total knee arthroplasty: A national database analysis using machine learning models

A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort

Prediction of complications and surgery duration in primary TKA with high accuracy using machine learning with arthroplasty-specific data

Risk Prediction Model for Knee Arthroplasty

Machine learning model outperforms the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non‐home discharge following primary total knee arthroplasty

Predicting 30-day reoperation following primary total knee arthroplasty: machine learning model outperforms the ACS risk calculator

Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Mortality After Hip Fracture with Machine Learning Techniques