Abstract:Importance Artificial intelligence (AI) enables powerful models for establishment of clinical diagnostic and prognostic tools for hip fractures; however the performance and potential impact of these newly developed algorithms are currently unknown. Objective To evaluate the performance of AI algorithms designed to diagnose hip fractures on radiographs and predict postoperative clinical outcomes following hip fracture surgery relative to current practices. Data Sources A systematic review of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for all articles published from database inception to January 23, 2023. A manual reference search of included articles was also undertaken to identify any additional relevant articles. Study Selection Studies developing machine learning (ML) models for the diagnosis of hip fractures from hip or pelvic radiographs or to predict any postoperative patient outcome following hip fracture surgery were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and was registered with PROSPERO. Eligible full-text articles were evaluated and relevant data extracted independently using a template data extraction form. For studies that predicted postoperative outcomes, the performance of traditional predictive statistical models, either multivariable logistic or linear regression, was recorded and compared with the performance of the best ML model on the same out-of-sample data set. Main Outcomes and Measures Diagnostic accuracy of AI models was compared with the diagnostic accuracy of expert clinicians using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Areas under the curve for postoperative outcome prediction between traditional statistical models (multivariable linear or logistic regression) and ML models were compared. Results Of 39 studies that met all criteria and were included in this analysis, 18 (46.2%) used AI models to diagnose hip fractures on plain radiographs and 21 (53.8%) used AI models to predict patient outcomes following hip fracture surgery. A total of 39 598 plain radiographs and 714 939 hip fractures were used for training, validating, and testing ML models specific to diagnosis and postoperative outcome prediction, respectively. Mortality and length of hospital stay were the most predicted outcomes. On pooled data analysis, compared with clinicians, the OR for diagnostic error of ML models was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.48-1.31; P = .36; I 2 = 60%) for hip fracture radiographs. For the ML models, the mean (SD) sensitivity was 89.3% (8.5%), specificity was 87.5% (9.9%), and F1 score was 0.90 (0.06). The mean area under the curve for mortality prediction was 0.84 with ML models compared with 0.79 for alternative controls ( P = .09). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the potential applications of AI to aid with diagnosis from hip radiographs are promising. The performance of AI in diagnosing hip fractures was comparable with that of expert radiologists and surgeons. However, current implementations of AI for outcome prediction do not seem to provide substantial benefit over traditional multivariable predictive statistics.

Supervised machine learning for the prediction of post‐operative clinical outcomes of hip and knee replacements: a review

Predicting patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning

The utility of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of patient-reported outcome measures following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty

Machine learning for predicting duration of surgery and length of stay: A literature review on joint arthroplasty

Artificial Intelligence for Hip Fracture Detection and Outcome Prediction

Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning for the hip and knee surgeon: current state and implications for the future

Predicting extended hospital stay following revision total hip arthroplasty: a machine learning model analysis based on the ACS-NSQIP database

Prediction of 30-Day Mortality Following Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Machine Learning Algorithms Outperform CARDE-B, 5-Item, and 6-Item Modified Frailty Index Risk Scores

Predictive Value of Machine Learning Models in Postoperative Mortality of Older Adults Patients with Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry

Machine learning for prediction of postoperative complications after hepato-biliary and pancreatic surgery

Machine learning prediction models in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review in transparent reporting

A machine learning-based prediction model pre-operatively for functional recovery after 1-year of hip fracture surgery in older people

Machine-Learning based Prediction Models for Healthcare Outcomes in Patients Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

Predicting 30-day unplanned hospital readmission after revision total knee arthroplasty: machine learning model analysis of a national patient cohort

Predicting the Risk of Total Hip Replacement by Using A Deep Learning Algorithm on Plain Pelvic Radiographs: Diagnostic Study

A comprehensive predictive model for postoperative joint function in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty patients: combining radiomics and clinical indicators

Surgical factors play a critical role in predicting functional outcomes using machine learning in robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty

Machine learning is better than surgeons at assessing unicompartmental knee replacement radiographs

Development of Machine-Learning Algorithms to Predict Attainment of Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Yield Fair Performance and Limited Clinical Utility

Machine Learning-Based Individualized Survival Prediction Model for Total Knee Replacement in Osteoarthritis: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative