Abstract:Data from 307 knee joints of 266 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, including 5 categorical and 7 continuous variables, was used for training 8 machine types to predict PCL removal and retention. The best model, LGBM classifier, was selected by AUC method, highlighting insall‐salvati index (ISI), lateral condyle height (LMH), and medial condyle height (MMH) as key variables. Objective Predicting whether the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) should be preserved during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures is a complex task in the preoperative phase. The choice to either retain or excise the PCL has a substantial effect on the surgical outcomes and biomechanical integrity of the knee joint after the operation. To enhance surgeons' ability to predict the removal and retention of the PCL in patients before TKA, we developed machine learning models. We also identified significant feature factors that contribute to accurate predictions during this process. Methods Patients' data on TKA continuously performed by a single surgeon who had intended initially to undergo implantation of cruciate‐retaining (CR) prostheses was collected. During the sacrifice of PCL, we utilized anterior‐stabilized (AS) tibial bearings. The dataset was split into CR and AS categories to form distinct groups. Relevant information regarding age, gender, body mass index (BMI), the affected side, and preoperative diagnosis was extracted by reviewing the medical records of the patients. To ensure the authenticity of the research, an initial step involved capturing X‐ray images before the surgery. These images were then analyzed to determine the height of the medial condyle (MMH) and lateral condyle (LMH), as well as the ratios between MLW and MMH and MLW and LMH. Additionally, the insall‐salvati index (ISI) was calculated, and the severity of any varus or valgus deformities was assessed. Eight machine‐learning methods were developed to predict the retention of PCL in TKA. Risk factor analysis was performed using the SHApley Additive exPlanations method. Results A total of 307 knee joints from 266 patients were included, among which there were 254 females and 53 males. A stratified random sampling technique was used to split patients in a 70:30 ratio into a training dataset and a testing dataset. Eight machine‐learning models were trained using data feeding. Except for the AUC of the LGBM Classifier, which is 0.70, the AUCs of other machine learning models are all lower than 0.70. In importance‐based analysis, ISI, MMH, LMH, deformity, and age were confirmed as important predictive factors for PCL retention in operations. Conclusion The LGBM Classifier model achieved the best performance in predicting PCL retention in TKA. Among the potential risk factors, ISI, MMH, LMH, and deformity played essential roles in the prediction of PCL retention.

A new neural network model that detects graft ruptures and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries

Graft Failure and Contralateral ACL Injuries After Primary ACL Reconstruction: An Analysis of Risk Factors Using Interpretable Machine Learning

Automated detection of anterior cruciate ligament tears using a deep convolutional neural network

A Deep Learning Model Enhances Clinicians' Diagnostic Accuracy to More Than 96% for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

A Deep Learning Model Enhances Clinicians' Diagnostic Accuracy to Over 96% for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures on MRI

Refined Detection and Classification of Knee Ligament Injury Based on ResNet Convolutional Neural Networks

Deep Learning Approach for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Lesion Detection: Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance Using Arthroscopy as the Reference Standard

Identifying Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Through Automated Video Analysis of In-Game Motion Patterns

Effective Automatic Detection of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Using Convolutional Neural Network with Two Attention Mechanism Modules.

Developing a Machine‐Learning Predictive Model for Retention of Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears From Magnetic Resonance Images: Algorithm Development and Validation Study

Ensemble Algorithm for Risk Prediction of Clinical Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Lightweight Attentive Graph Neural Network with Conditional Random Field for Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

Identifying potential patient-specific predictors for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcome – a diagnostic in vitro tissue remodeling platform

Early ACLR and Risk and Timing of Secondary Meniscal Injury Compared With Delayed ACLR or Nonoperative Treatment: A Time-to-Event Analysis Using Machine Learning

Predicting the Recovery of Isokinetic Knee Strength 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Re-tear after arthroscopic rotator cuff tear surgery: risk analysis using machine learning

Automatic segmentation model of intercondylar fossa based on deep learning: a novel and effective assessment method for the notch volume

A deep learning approach for anterior cruciate ligament rupture localization on knee MR images.

Enhanced reliability and time efficiency of deep learning‐based posterior tibial slope measurement over manual techniques