Evaluation of Numerical and Analytical Methods to Accurately Measure Elastic Modulus of the Cobalt Chromium Alloy Fabricated by Laser Direct Energy Deposition Process

David Smith,Paula Pickett,Joncy Thorpe,Theresa Grabowski,Fardad Azarmi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-10206-1
IF: 2.3
2024-10-06
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
Abstract:The main focus of this study is to analyze the accuracy of non-experimental approaches to estimate the elastic modulus of an additively manufactured cobalt chromium (CoCr) alloy with a wide range of industrial application. To this end, the results obtained from the application of numerical and analytical techniques were compared to the experimental results to understand the accuracy of these methods for estimation of the elastic properties of laser direct energy deposition (LDED)-processed samples. A conventionally manufactured CoCr alloy sample with similar composition was also subjected to the same analysis for the purpose of validation of the results. Resonance frequency is an accurate and reliable experimental method and was used for evaluation of elastic modulus of both samples. Two well-known analytical methods using porosity content (Hashin–Hasselman) and hardness (Marshall) as well as a micromechanical model based on dislocation density within microstructures were utilized for measurement of elastic modulus of both samples in this study. Two different finite element analysis (FEA) schemes were also conducted here to estimate elastic properties of the CoCr samples. The first method utilized a commercial software to develop models according to the samples geometry, while the second method, object-oriented finite element analysis (OOF), used actual micrographs. The actual elastic modulus values were 270.56 and 228.41 GPa for the LDED- and conventionally processed samples, respectively. Most of the techniques could provide a good approximation within 5% of the experimental value of the elastic modulus for the conventionally processed sample. However, while the results from analytical models and FEA were not in good agreement with experimental ones, the model based on dislocation density provided the most acceptable results for the LDED-processed sample. The failure of the other methods could be attributed to the non-uniform and complex microstructure of the additively manufactured CoCr sample.
materials science, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?