Fracture strength of preformed zirconia crown and CAD–CAM zirconia, ceramic, and hybrid composite crowns for the restoration of primary molars: An in vitro study

Joy Elian El Hayek,Hani Tohme,Lara Nasr,Roula El Hachem,Nathalie Kabbani,Nada Farhat Mchayleh,Joy Elian El Hayek,Roula El Hachem
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13171
IF: 3.264
2024-02-26
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
Abstract:Background Paediatric‐preformed zirconia crowns have been associated with several issues, primarily their inability to be crimped and the need for extensive tooth preparation. Additionally, the capacity to adjust the size, shape, and fit of these crowns is very limited. Aim To evaluate and compare the fracture strength of four different types of dental crowns intended for paediatric patients. Design The fracture resistance of four types of paediatric crowns was evaluated using the universal testing machine; freshly extracted primary molars received one of the following: preformed zirconia crowns, custom‐made computer‐aided design and computer‐aided manufacturing (CAD–CAM) zirconia crowns, custom‐made CAD–CAM ceramic crowns, and custom‐made CAD–CAM hybrid composite crowns. Data were statistically compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Bonferroni test, and the level of significance was set at 5%. Results Results showed that there was a statistically significant difference among the four groups (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,pediatrics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?