Dancing in Chains: Feminist Satire in Pride and Prejudice. (Miscellany)
Judith Wylie
Abstract:Judith Wylie is a doctoral candidate in English at Drew University. Her dissertation focuses on Austen's use of comic characters. Her most recent publication is "Incarnate Crimes: Masculine Gendering and the Double in Jane Eyre" in Victorians Institute Journal, Volume 27, 1999. ********** SATIRE HAS LONG BEEN CONSIDERED the province of the male writer, and women, especially the older, outspoken ones, have been the target of the male satirist's venom. Aspiring female writers such as Jane Austen, hopeful of earning a place as an Augustan wit, knew their open criticism of the establishment would not lead to long or successful literary careers. Yet Austen wished to break from the restrictive confines of the sentimental novel, the literary form deemed sufficient to hold the imaginative and creative skills of a proper woman writer. For years she played the literary wallflower, hesitant to express her feminist views. She recognized that if she were to dance without injury at this particular ball, she had to execute each step with perfect timing and precision. As a successful comic novelist, Austen found that she could dance exquisitely though wearing chains forged by the conservative literary establishment. She rarely misstepped, although under her breath she was whistling her own tune. By writing comedy Austen was trespassing on male literary territory, but she did win accolades from the literary establishment, in part for following the masculine lead and ridiculing the follies of the feminine sex. However, in the tradition of the satiric trickster, Austen turns her comedic message inside out, by interpolating within the seemingly conservative tenor of her novels a satiric feminist subtext quite at odds with the surface conventionality, a strategy that Susan Fraiman calls "counternarrative." This dialogic style allows women writers to "argue in the same track as men" through their depiction of the "ideal" female but also to present "dissident tracks" (31) that undercut this patriarchal icon of feminine behavior. These "dissident tracks" are often traversed by a minor female character whose words and behavior are criticized while the heroine, conforming to the romantic narrative direction of the text, is held up as the untarnished role model. In Pride and Prejudice, the "dissident track" is cut by a truth-telling female monster, Mrs. Bennet, who is employed to question masculine prerogatives. On the surface, Mrs. Bennet seems to be the perfect subject for ridicule because she appears to be truly silly and mindless. The author's veiled feminist message is revealed only when the reader looks past the humor aimed at women and then asks why a character such as Mrs. Bennet acts as she does. In the words of Mikhail Bakhtin, Stupidity (incomprehension) in the novel is always polemical: it interacts dialogically with an intelligence (a lofty pseudo intelligence) with which it polemicizes and whose mask it tears....[A]t its heart always lies a polemical failure to understand someone else's discourse, someone else's pathos-charged lie that has appropriated the world and aspires to conceptualize it, a polemical failure to understand generally accepted, canonized, inveterately false languages with their lofty labels for things and events. (403) The overt lesson of Austen's satire is that male supremacy is no joke but rather a force to be reckoned with, and to survive, a female must gain masculine approval and protection. Her third-person "objective" narrator appears to be in perfect agreement with the patriarchal mandate that anything that is beneficial to men must, therefore, benefit women. However, the perceptive reader must ask if this conventional stance is reliable or just another satirical trick. If we remove the mask from the narrator, we find Austen, herself an unruly older female, compelling the reader to question the veracity of the heroine's fairy tale ending, to study instead the example of Mrs. …
Sociology,Art