Pride and Prejudice and Poor Laws
Sheryl Craig
Abstract:Originally written as First Impressions in 1796 and 1797, Pride and Prejudice suggests that the author was in favor of two controversial economic proposals being debated in the House of Commons and in the press at the time, a national minimum wage and an expansion of the existing Poor Law benefits. The minimum-wage proposal was based on the price of a loaf of wheat bread. The idea was that at the end of a workday, a man should be paid enough to buy a loaf of bread in order to maintain himself. The other economic proposal--an expansion of the old Elizabethan Poor Laws--would have made it easier for people to get welfare benefits and would have increased the benefits they were eligible to receive. Both proposals were championed by Tory Prime Minister William Pitt and supported by a coalition of liberal Tories and moderate Whigs in the House of Commons. Both proposals were opposed by radical Whigs and reactionary Tories, who argued that the higher wages and expanded benefits were too expensive and entirely unnecessary. Georgian England had a two-party political system, but neither Tories nor Whigs had an official party platform, and there was a great deal of dissension in both parties' ranks. In general, Tories represented agricultural interests and were considered to be the party of rural Old England. Whigs represented large cities and the interests of merchants, bankers, manufacturers, factory-, mine-, and ship-owners, and people whose main source of income was invested money. King George III favored the Tories, but his son, the Prince of Wales, sided with the Whigs, as did most aristocrats. The assets of women were usually tied up in trusts, settlements, and investments, so wealthy, especially aristocratic, women, like the Duchess of Devonshire, were generally Whig sympathizers. Of course, women could not vote. They could, however, contribute money to political campaigns and show their public support, which gave them political clout. Evangelicals in the Church of England, like William Wilberforce, and religious non-conformists, such as Methodists and Quakers, were almost invariably Whigs. Austen's original readers would have known that Elizabeth Bennet's agricultural county, Hertfordshire, was, for the working classes, the poorest county in England, as Frederic Eden's 1797 survey, The State of the Poor, documented. At the other end of the spectrum, Fitzwilliam Darcy's Derbyshire, financially stimulated by the Industrial Revolution, was one of the richest counties in the nation and a Whig stronghold. By its presentation of the different Whig characters, Jane Austen's novel encouraged Whig readers to be generous to laboring classes and implicitly suggested that Tory readers continue to support the Prime Minister and look approvingly on those Whigs who were also willing to help the poor. The old Elizabethan Poor Law stipulated that no one should be allowed to starve to death and that the poor must be given their daily bread, and it required each parish to provide a poorhouse to shelter the homeless. Most of the residents in parish poorhouses were either very young, under ten years of age, or very old. The majority of the elderly were women. Tax rates to comply with the Poor Law were set by the landowners, who were the taxpayers in each parish, supposedly in response to need. The result was that taxes and welfare benefits varied enormously from county to county and parish to parish. To prevent welfare shopping, parishes were only required to provide for local residents well known in the community. Outdoor relief--that is, providing benefits to people not residing in the poorhouse--was a widespread practice, but not every parish offered outdoor relief, and some counties, like the Bennets' Hertfordshire, were making it increasingly difficult to gain admittance into their crowded poorhouses (Eden 206). Normally, about 10% of the inhabitants in a parish received some form of aid through the Poor Laws. …
Sociology,Law