Abstract:AC loss presents a significant challenge for high-temperature superconducting (HTS) rotating machines. To date, the behaviour of total AC loss (Qtol) (with current) and magnetization loss (Qm) (without current) in a single HTS tape under rotating magnetic fields (RF) have been explored. However, a research gap remains in understanding how these findings translate to the more complex HTS windings of rotating machines. Further exploration is needed to understand the loss behaviour of more complex HTS structures, such as HTS stacks. In this work, Qtol and Qm, in the HTS stacks under RF and a perpendicular AC standing wave magnetic field are numerically investigated. Two different RF models are considered: one is the Uni-RF model, characterized by a uniform field with equal field amplitudes and phases at each position, and the other is a non-uniform field created by a rotating Halbach array, referred to as the Hal-RF model. The dependence of AC loss on parameters such as the number of tapes in the stacks, tape width (2a), and the inclination angle (alpha) of tapes, which refers to the angle between the normal direction of the stack and the vertical direction, have been explored. The number of tapes in the stacks ranges from 1 to 16, alpha ranges from 0 degrees to 90 degrees, and the tape width includes 4 mm and 40 mm. Additionally, different rotating field directions are also considered. Interestingly, the analytical values from Brandt and Indenbom equation for Qm of a superconducting strip (BI-strip) are close to Qm results of the stacks under the standing wave at high fields, while they are over twice as high as those in the Hal-RF model at 1 T. This suggests the BI-strip equation is not reliable for predicting Qm under RF at high fields. We also show in the Hal-RF model that different rotation directions of the field lead to varying Qm and Qtol when asymmetric Jc (B, theta) data are applied. Moreover, it has been observed that the inclination angle has no impact on Qm under uniform RF while significantly impacts both Qm and Qtol in the Hal-RF model.

Alternative analytical models for HTS tapes considering their AC hysteretic and resistive losses

Numerical models for AC loss calculation in large-scale applications of HTS coated conductors

Computation of Losses in HTS Under the Action of Varying Magnetic Fields and Currents

Ac Losses in Hts Tapes and Devices with Transport Current Solved Through the Resistivity-Adaption Algorithm

Self-consistent Modeling of the $I_c$ of HTS Devices: How Accurate do Models Really Need to Be?

A frequency-domain finite element model for simulating high-temperature superconductors using the J-A and T-A formulations

Electromechanical Analysis of HTS Cage Rotors for Induction-Synchronous Machines

Practical Forecasting of AC Losses in Multi-layer 2G-HTS Cold Dielectric Conductors

Understanding and minimizing ac losses in CORC cables of YBCO superconducting tapes

Numerical Analysis on the Current Distribution and the Loss in HTS Stacked Tapes Considering Termination Resistances

A Novel Estimation Model for Hysteresis Loss Based on Semi-Minor Loops

Numerical Simulations on the AC Loss of REBCO Stacks under Rotating Magnetic Fields

Determination of I-V Curves of HTS Tapes From The Frequency Dependent AC Transport Loss

Strain dependence of critical current and self-field AC loss in Bi-2223/Ag multi-filamentary HTS tapes: a general predictive model

Circuit Model of Interlayer and Screening Currents in Layer-Wound NI HTS Coils

Calculation Of Ac Losses In Hts Tape With Fea Program Ansys

Calculation of AC losses in stacks and coils made of second generation high temperature superconducting tapes for large scale applications

Estimation of hysteretic losses for MgB2 tapes under the operating conditions of a generator

Simulation of Current Profile and AC Loss of HTS Winding Wound by Parallel-Connected Tapes

An Investigation on AC Loss Reduction for Permanent-Magnet Superconducting Electrical Machine

Electromagnetic Assessment and AC Losses of Triaxial Cables with Multiple 2G-HTS Layers Per Phase