Remark on Fermat's Last Theorem

Ivan Deriyenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.06876

2021-09-14

Combinatorics

Abstract:In this short article we do not prove Fermat's last theorem. We show that the number 2 is an exceptional number in this theorem.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

An elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Yuri Arenberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.03961

2020-09-30

General Mathematics

Abstract:We show that an elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT) exists. Our paper also extends the scope of FLT from integers to all rational numbers.
Fermat's Last Theorem: Algebra and Number Theory

Felix Sidokhine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.00501

2016-05-02

Number Theory

Abstract:In our work we give the examples using Fermat's Last Theorem for solving some problems from algebra and number theory.
An Elementary and Simple Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Mike Winkler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.1689

2014-12-03

General Mathematics

Abstract:Fermat's Last Theorem states that the Diophantine equation $X^n+Y^n=Z^n$ has no non-trivial solution for any $n$ greater than 2. In this paper we give a brief and simple proof of the theorem using only elementary methods.
On Fermat's Last Theorem for odd prime exponents

Zenon B. Batang

2023-04-01

Abstract:We show that the Fermat equation $x^p + y^p = z^p$ has no solutions in coprime positive integers $x, y, z$ for any odd prime $p$.

General Mathematics
Did have Fermat the solution? An elementary proof of his Last Theorem

Miguel Antonio Marano Calzolari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.01599

2020-05-28

General Mathematics

Abstract:We present an elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. No ancillary results are used, not even the most basic ones. The proof directly leads to a contradiction of the Fermat equation in the set of integers.
Fermat's Last Theorem: Algebra, Geometry, and Number Theory

Felix Sidokhine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.06118

2016-07-16

History and Overview

Abstract:In our work we give the examples using Fermat's Last Theorem for solving some problems from algebra, geometry and number theory
The lost proof of Fermat's last theorem

Andrea Ossicini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10234471

2024-03-10

Abstract:This work contains two papers: the first published in 2022 and entitled "On the nature of some Euler's double equations equivalent to Fermat's last theorem" provides a marvellous proof through the so-called discordant forms of appropriate Euler's double equations, which could have entered in a not very narrow margin and the second instead published in 2024 and entitled "Some Diophantus-Fermat double equations equivalent to Frey's elliptic curve" provides the possible proof, which Fermat has not published in detail, but which uses the characteristic of all right-angled triangles with sides equal to whole numbers, or the famous Pythagorean identity. Some explanations in session(III) are provided: the first makes evident the nature of the "proof a' la Fermat" and the subsequent sessions clarify the direct and interesting connection of the two elementary proofs and it is necessary if you want to understand how two different elementary proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem are possible. It must be observed that those proofs must in no way be interpreted as a sort of absurd revenge of elementary number theory over more modern analytic and algebraic treatments.The author himself has added a section in which he connects his concepts with some of those used by Wiles in his complex demonstration.This implies that, to a certain extent, Wiles' demonstration inspired the author of those works. Ultimately in this paper we will illustrate how only thanks to some of Euler's discoveries was it possible to shed light on the so-called too narrow margin never written by Fermat. For this reason we will also provide some details on an article that was the real inspiration for achieving these results (see Last Conclusions).

General Mathematics
Fermat's Last Theorem over $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$

Maleeha Khawaja,Frazer Jarvis

2024-05-09

Abstract:In this paper, we begin the study of the Fermat equation $x^n+y^n=z^n$ over real biquadratic fields. In particular, we prove that there are no non-trivial solutions to the Fermat equation over $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$ for $n\geq 4$.

Number Theory
General Elementary Direct Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Hua Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.15452

2020-07-27

General Mathematics

Abstract:This paper presents a novel direct elementary proof for Fermat's Last Theorem. We use algebra, modular math, and binomial series to develop inherent mathematical relationships hidden within Fermat's Last Theorem. With these derived relationships, we are able to develop general pattern applicable for all positive integers of n. Finally, we are able to confirm and complete the direct proof for Fermat's Diophantine equation for all n.
Lots of Proofs of the Fermat Theorem

Wenwu Zhu

2006-01-01

Abstract:In this paper we give lots of proofs of Fermat Theorem in the elementary number theory by using the knowledge of the elementary number theory and theorems of the Moden Mathematics.The proofs are different from the traditional one.The using methods are special.
One curious proof of Fermat's little theorem

Giedrius Alkauskas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0801.0805

2008-01-05

Number Theory

Abstract:We give a proof of Fermat's little theorem which does not use nor arithmetic(Euclidean algorithm) neither algebra (group theory), but it rather employs the field of the formal power series Q((x)). The note is an example of a mathematical joke, though it contains a rigorous proof. (The paper will appear in print exactly as in the version v3).
A Geometric Proof of Fermat’s Little Theorem

Thomas Beatty,Marc Barry,Andrew Orsini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2018.81004

2018-01-01

Advances in Pure Mathematics

Abstract:We present an intuitively satisfying geometric proof of Fermat's result for positive integers that for prime moduli p, provided p does not divide a. This is known as Fermat’s Little Theorem. The proof is novel in using the idea of colorings applied to regular polygons to establish a number-theo retic result. A lemma traditionally, if ambiguously, attributed to Burnside provides a critical enumeration step.

English Else
Fibonacci numbers and Fermat's last theorem

Zhi-Hong Sun,Zhi-Wei Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4064/aa-60-4-371-388

1992-01-01

Acta Arithmetica

Abstract:Let {F(n)} be the Fibonacci sequence defined by F0 = 0, F1 = 1, F(n) + 1 = F(n) + F(n-1) (n greater-than-or-equal-to 1). It is well known that F(p-)(5/p) = 0 (mod p) for any odd prime p, where (-) denotes the Legendre symbol. In 1960 D.D. Wall [13] asked whether p2/F(p-)(5/p) is always impossible; up to now this is still open. In this paper the sum [GRAPHICS] is expressed in terms of Fibonacci numbers. As applications we obtain a new formula for the Fibonacci quotient F(p-)(5/p)/p and a criterion for the relation p/F(p-1)/4 (if p = 1 (mod 4)), where p not-equal 5 is an odd prime. We also prove that the affirmative answer to Wall's question implies the first case of FLT (Fermat's last theorem); from this it follows that the first case of FLT holds for those exponents which are (odd) Fibonacci primes or Lucas primes.
On Generalizing a Corollary of Fermat’s Little Theorem

Gove Effinger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-019-09922-7

2019-08-12

The Mathematical Intelligencer

Abstract:A friend who teaches middle-school math recently asked me whether it was a coincidence that every positive integer and its fifth power seem to have the same last (i.e., rightmost) decimal digit. I said that it was definitely not a coincidence and that it followed from a theorem in number theory called Euler's theorem, which I explained briefly. Right after this, however, I recalled that since the theorem applies only to numbers that are relatively prime to the modulus (which is 10 in this case, since dividing any positive integer by 10 and taking the remainder gives us that integer's last digit), the theorem applies only to numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, or 9, and cannot be applied to numbers ending in 0, 2, 4, 5, 6, or 8, since they are not relatively prime to 10. Nonetheless, we can easily check that in this case, his observation works for all these numbers as well: <span class="InlineEquation">$2^5=32$</span>

mathematics
Fermat's Last Theorem for regular primes

Alex J. Best,Christopher Birkbeck,Riccardo Brasca,Eric Rodriguez Boidi

2023-05-22

Abstract:We formalise the proof of the first case of Fermat's Last Theorem for regular primes using the \emph{Lean} theorem prover and its mathematical library \emph{mathlib}. This is an important 19th century result that motivated the development of modern algebraic number theory. Besides explaining the mathematics behind this result, we analyze in this paper the difficulties we faced in the formalisation process and how we solved them. For example, we had to deal with a diamond about characteristic zero fields and problems arising from multiple nested coercions related to number fields. We also explain how we integrated our work to \emph{mathlib}.

Logic in Computer Science,Number Theory
On first case of Fermat's Last Theorem in the spirit of Kummer and Furtwangler

Roland Queme

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0903.2170

2009-03-12

Number Theory

Abstract:This paper has been withdrawn by the author [arXiv admin].
The Cartesian method and Fermat's Last Theorem

Hector Ivan Nunez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.11775

2021-06-21

General Mathematics

Abstract:Fermat's Last Theorem is proved by using the philosophical and mathematical knowledge of 1637 when the French mathematician Pierre de Fermat claimed to have a truly marvelous proof of his conjecture. Our approach consists of setting three variables of Fermat's equation as integers and then evaluating whether the remaining variable can be an integer as well. Pythagorean triples play a fundamental role in claiming that at least an irrational number is needed to satisfy Fermat's equation. As a result, we confirm that Fermat's Last Theorem is valid.
Fermat’s last theorem proved in Hilbert arithmetic. I. From the proof by induction to the viewpoint of Hilbert arithmetic

Vasil Penchev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3785977

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:In a previous paper (https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3648127 ), an elementary and thoroughly arithmetical proof of Fermat’s last theorem by induction has been demonstrated if the case for “n = 3” is granted as proved only arithmetically (which is a fact a long time ago), furthermore in a way accessible to Fermat himself though without being absolutely and precisely correct. The present paper elucidates the contemporary mathematical background, from which an inductive proof of FLT can be inferred since its proof for the case for “n = 3” has been known for a long time. It needs “Hilbert mathematics”, which is inherently complete unlike the usual “Gödel mathematics”, and based on “Hilbert arithmetic” to generalize Peano arithmetic in a way to unify it with the qubit Hilbert space of quantum information. An “epoché to infinity” (similar to Husserl’s “epoché to reality”) is necessary to map Hilbert arithmetic into Peano arithmetic in order to be relevant to Fermat’s age. Furthermore, the two linked semigroups originating from addition and multiplication and from the Peano axioms in the final analysis can be postulated algebraically as independent of each other in a “Hamilton” modification of arithmetic supposedly equivalent to Peano arithmetic. The inductive proof of FLT can be deduced absolutely precisely in that Hamilton arithmetic and the pransfered as a corollary in the standard Peano arithmetic furthermore in a way accessible in Fermat’s epoch and thus, to himself in principle. A future, second part of the paper is outlined, getting directed to an eventual proof of the case “n=3” based on the qubit Hilbert space and the Kochen-Specker theorem inferable from it.
A new generalization of Fermat's Last Theorem

tianxin cai,deyi chen,yong zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2014.09.014

IF: 0.679

2013-01-01

Journal of Number Theory

Abstract: In this paper, we consider some hybrid Diophantine equations of addition and multiplication. We first improve a result on new Hilbert-Waring problem. Then we consider the equation \begin{equation} \begin{cases} A+B=C ABC=D^n \end{cases} \end{equation} where $A,B,C,D,n \in\ZZ_{+}$ and $n\geq3$, which may be regarded as a generalization of Fermat's equation $x^n+y^n=z^n$. When $\gcd(A,B,C)=1$, $(1)$ is equivalent to Fermat's equation, which means it has no positive integer solutions. We discuss several cases for $\gcd(A,B,C)=p^k$ where $p$ is an odd prime. In particular, for $k=1$ we prove that $(1)$ has no nonzero integer solutions when $n=3$ and we conjecture that it is also true for any prime $n>3$. Finally, we consider equation $(1)$ in quadratic fields $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{t})$ for $n=3$.
Fermat's Last Theorem-Wiles'Last Proofs

Zhang Xian-ke

Abstract:Fermat's Last Theorem, one of the great unsolved problems in Mathematics for three hundred andfifty years, has recently beed proved by Professor Andrew Wiles of Princeton University. Shocking the mathematical circles, it also arouses far-fLung and fervency interest all over the world. Here briefly the whole eventand history, prizes and comments, vitae and traits of Wiles, stories in the last 8-year proof, and, at the end,some related modern mathematics and the approach of Wiles are sketched. Reference resources are also given.

Mathematics

Remark on Fermat's Last Theorem

An elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Fermat's Last Theorem: Algebra and Number Theory

An Elementary and Simple Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

On Fermat's Last Theorem for odd prime exponents

Did have Fermat the solution? An elementary proof of his Last Theorem

Fermat's Last Theorem: Algebra, Geometry, and Number Theory

The lost proof of Fermat's last theorem

Fermat's Last Theorem over $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$

General Elementary Direct Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Lots of Proofs of the Fermat Theorem

One curious proof of Fermat's little theorem

A Geometric Proof of Fermat’s Little Theorem

Fibonacci numbers and Fermat's last theorem

On Generalizing a Corollary of Fermat’s Little Theorem

Fermat's Last Theorem for regular primes

On first case of Fermat's Last Theorem in the spirit of Kummer and Furtwangler

The Cartesian method and Fermat's Last Theorem

Fermat’s last theorem proved in Hilbert arithmetic. I. From the proof by induction to the viewpoint of Hilbert arithmetic

A new generalization of Fermat's Last Theorem

Fermat's Last Theorem-Wiles'Last Proofs