Lots of Proofs of the Fermat Theorem

Wenwu Zhu

2006-01-01

Abstract:In this paper we give lots of proofs of Fermat Theorem in the elementary number theory by using the knowledge of the elementary number theory and theorems of the Moden Mathematics.The proofs are different from the traditional one.The using methods are special.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

General Elementary Direct Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Hua Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.15452

2020-07-27

General Mathematics

Abstract:This paper presents a novel direct elementary proof for Fermat's Last Theorem. We use algebra, modular math, and binomial series to develop inherent mathematical relationships hidden within Fermat's Last Theorem. With these derived relationships, we are able to develop general pattern applicable for all positive integers of n. Finally, we are able to confirm and complete the direct proof for Fermat's Diophantine equation for all n.
An elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Yuri Arenberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.03961

2020-09-30

General Mathematics

Abstract:We show that an elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT) exists. Our paper also extends the scope of FLT from integers to all rational numbers.
A Geometric Proof of Fermat’s Little Theorem

Thomas Beatty,Marc Barry,Andrew Orsini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2018.81004

2018-01-01

Advances in Pure Mathematics

Abstract:We present an intuitively satisfying geometric proof of Fermat's result for positive integers that for prime moduli p, provided p does not divide a. This is known as Fermat’s Little Theorem. The proof is novel in using the idea of colorings applied to regular polygons to establish a number-theo retic result. A lemma traditionally, if ambiguously, attributed to Burnside provides a critical enumeration step.

English Else
An Elementary and Simple Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Mike Winkler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.1689

2014-12-03

General Mathematics

Abstract:Fermat's Last Theorem states that the Diophantine equation $X^n+Y^n=Z^n$ has no non-trivial solution for any $n$ greater than 2. In this paper we give a brief and simple proof of the theorem using only elementary methods.
The lost proof of Fermat's last theorem

Andrea Ossicini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10234471

2024-03-10

Abstract:This work contains two papers: the first published in 2022 and entitled "On the nature of some Euler's double equations equivalent to Fermat's last theorem" provides a marvellous proof through the so-called discordant forms of appropriate Euler's double equations, which could have entered in a not very narrow margin and the second instead published in 2024 and entitled "Some Diophantus-Fermat double equations equivalent to Frey's elliptic curve" provides the possible proof, which Fermat has not published in detail, but which uses the characteristic of all right-angled triangles with sides equal to whole numbers, or the famous Pythagorean identity. Some explanations in session(III) are provided: the first makes evident the nature of the "proof a' la Fermat" and the subsequent sessions clarify the direct and interesting connection of the two elementary proofs and it is necessary if you want to understand how two different elementary proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem are possible. It must be observed that those proofs must in no way be interpreted as a sort of absurd revenge of elementary number theory over more modern analytic and algebraic treatments.The author himself has added a section in which he connects his concepts with some of those used by Wiles in his complex demonstration.This implies that, to a certain extent, Wiles' demonstration inspired the author of those works. Ultimately in this paper we will illustrate how only thanks to some of Euler's discoveries was it possible to shed light on the so-called too narrow margin never written by Fermat. For this reason we will also provide some details on an article that was the real inspiration for achieving these results (see Last Conclusions).

General Mathematics
One curious proof of Fermat's little theorem

Giedrius Alkauskas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0801.0805

2008-01-05

Number Theory

Abstract:We give a proof of Fermat's little theorem which does not use nor arithmetic(Euclidean algorithm) neither algebra (group theory), but it rather employs the field of the formal power series Q((x)). The note is an example of a mathematical joke, though it contains a rigorous proof. (The paper will appear in print exactly as in the version v3).
Did have Fermat the solution? An elementary proof of his Last Theorem

Miguel Antonio Marano Calzolari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.01599

2020-05-28

General Mathematics

Abstract:We present an elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. No ancillary results are used, not even the most basic ones. The proof directly leads to a contradiction of the Fermat equation in the set of integers.
Diophantine Equations and Fermat’s Last Theorem for Multivariate (Skew-)Polynomials

Jie Pan,Yu-ming Jia,Fang Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-024-4630-6

2024-01-01

Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities

Abstract:Fermat’s Last Theorem is a famous theorem in number theory which is difficult to prove. However, it is known that the version of polynomials with one variable of Fermat’s Last Theorem over ℂ can be proved very concisely. The aim of this paper is to study the similar problems about Fermat’s Last Theorem for multivariate (skew)-polynomials with any characteristic.
Fermat's Last Theorem for regular primes

Alex J. Best,Christopher Birkbeck,Riccardo Brasca,Eric Rodriguez Boidi

2023-05-22

Abstract:We formalise the proof of the first case of Fermat's Last Theorem for regular primes using the \emph{Lean} theorem prover and its mathematical library \emph{mathlib}. This is an important 19th century result that motivated the development of modern algebraic number theory. Besides explaining the mathematics behind this result, we analyze in this paper the difficulties we faced in the formalisation process and how we solved them. For example, we had to deal with a diamond about characteristic zero fields and problems arising from multiple nested coercions related to number fields. We also explain how we integrated our work to \emph{mathlib}.

Logic in Computer Science,Number Theory
A new generalization of Fermat's Last Theorem

tianxin cai,deyi chen,yong zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2014.09.014

IF: 0.679

2013-01-01

Journal of Number Theory

Abstract: In this paper, we consider some hybrid Diophantine equations of addition and multiplication. We first improve a result on new Hilbert-Waring problem. Then we consider the equation \begin{equation} \begin{cases} A+B=C ABC=D^n \end{cases} \end{equation} where $A,B,C,D,n \in\ZZ_{+}$ and $n\geq3$, which may be regarded as a generalization of Fermat's equation $x^n+y^n=z^n$. When $\gcd(A,B,C)=1$, $(1)$ is equivalent to Fermat's equation, which means it has no positive integer solutions. We discuss several cases for $\gcd(A,B,C)=p^k$ where $p$ is an odd prime. In particular, for $k=1$ we prove that $(1)$ has no nonzero integer solutions when $n=3$ and we conjecture that it is also true for any prime $n>3$. Finally, we consider equation $(1)$ in quadratic fields $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{t})$ for $n=3$.
Fermat's Last Theorem: Algebra, Geometry, and Number Theory

Felix Sidokhine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.06118

2016-07-16

History and Overview

Abstract:In our work we give the examples using Fermat's Last Theorem for solving some problems from algebra, geometry and number theory
Fermat's Last Theorem: Algebra and Number Theory

Felix Sidokhine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.00501

2016-05-02

Number Theory

Abstract:In our work we give the examples using Fermat's Last Theorem for solving some problems from algebra and number theory.
The Cartesian method and Fermat's Last Theorem

Hector Ivan Nunez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.11775

2021-06-21

General Mathematics

Abstract:Fermat's Last Theorem is proved by using the philosophical and mathematical knowledge of 1637 when the French mathematician Pierre de Fermat claimed to have a truly marvelous proof of his conjecture. Our approach consists of setting three variables of Fermat's equation as integers and then evaluating whether the remaining variable can be an integer as well. Pythagorean triples play a fundamental role in claiming that at least an irrational number is needed to satisfy Fermat's equation. As a result, we confirm that Fermat's Last Theorem is valid.
Fibonacci numbers and Fermat's last theorem

Zhi-Hong Sun,Zhi-Wei Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4064/aa-60-4-371-388

1992-01-01

Acta Arithmetica

Abstract:Let {F(n)} be the Fibonacci sequence defined by F0 = 0, F1 = 1, F(n) + 1 = F(n) + F(n-1) (n greater-than-or-equal-to 1). It is well known that F(p-)(5/p) = 0 (mod p) for any odd prime p, where (-) denotes the Legendre symbol. In 1960 D.D. Wall [13] asked whether p2/F(p-)(5/p) is always impossible; up to now this is still open. In this paper the sum [GRAPHICS] is expressed in terms of Fibonacci numbers. As applications we obtain a new formula for the Fibonacci quotient F(p-)(5/p)/p and a criterion for the relation p/F(p-1)/4 (if p = 1 (mod 4)), where p not-equal 5 is an odd prime. We also prove that the affirmative answer to Wall's question implies the first case of FLT (Fermat's last theorem); from this it follows that the first case of FLT holds for those exponents which are (odd) Fibonacci primes or Lucas primes.
Fermat's Last Theorem-Wiles'Last Proofs

Zhang Xian-ke

Abstract:Fermat's Last Theorem, one of the great unsolved problems in Mathematics for three hundred andfifty years, has recently beed proved by Professor Andrew Wiles of Princeton University. Shocking the mathematical circles, it also arouses far-fLung and fervency interest all over the world. Here briefly the whole eventand history, prizes and comments, vitae and traits of Wiles, stories in the last 8-year proof, and, at the end,some related modern mathematics and the approach of Wiles are sketched. Reference resources are also given.

Mathematics
Fermat’s Little Theorem via Divisibility of Newton’s Binomial

Rafał Ziobro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/forma-2015-0018

2015-09-01

Formalized Mathematics

Abstract:Abstract Solving equations in integers is an important part of the number theory [29]. In many cases it can be conducted by the factorization of equation’s elements, such as the Newton’s binomial. The article introduces several simple formulas, which may facilitate this process. Some of them are taken from relevant books [28], [14]. In the second section of the article, Fermat’s Little Theorem is proved in a classical way, on the basis of divisibility of Newton’s binomial. Although slightly redundant in its content (another proof of the theorem has earlier been included in [12]), the article provides a good example, how the application of registrations could shorten the length of Mizar proofs [9], [17].

English Else
A Quixotic Proof of Fermat's Two Squares Theorem for Prime Numbers

Roland Bacher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2023.2242034

2023-08-17

Abstract:Every odd prime number p has exactly (p+1)/2 different expressions as a sum ab + cd of two ordered products ab and cd such that min(a,b)>max(c,d) . An easy corollary is a proof of Fermat's Theorem expressing primes in 1+4N as sums of two squares.

mathematics
Windmills of the minds: an algorithm for Fermat's Two Squares Theorem

Hing Lun Chan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.02556

2021-12-05

Logic in Computer Science

Abstract:The two squares theorem of Fermat is a gem in number theory, with a spectacular one-sentence "proof from the Book". Here is a formalisation of this proof, with an interpretation using windmill patterns. The theory behind involves involutions on a finite set, especially the parity of the number of fixed points in the involutions. Starting as an existence proof that is non-constructive, there is an ingenious way to turn it into a constructive one. This gives an algorithm to compute the two squares by iterating the two involutions alternatively from a known fixed point.
Yet another Proof of an old Hat

Roland Bacher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.02788

2021-10-29

History and Overview

Abstract:Every odd prime number p can be written in exactly (p + 1)/2 ways as a sum ab + cd with min(a, b) > max(c, d) of two ordered products. This gives a new proof Fermat's Theorem expressing primes of the form 1 + 4N as sums of two squares 1 .
Sur le théorème de Fermat sur ${\bf Q}(\sqrt{5})$

Alain Kraus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1410.2420

2014-10-09

Number Theory

Abstract:Let $p$ be an odd prime number. Using modular arguments, we give an easy testable condition which allows often to prove Fermat's Last Theorem over the quadratic field ${\bf Q}(\sqrt{5})$ for the exponent $p$. It is related to the Wendt's resultant of the polynomials $X^n-1$ and $(X+1)^n-1$. We deduce Fermat's Last Theorem over this field in case one has $5\leq p<10^7$, and we obtain analogous results on Sophie Germain type criteria.

Lots of Proofs of the Fermat Theorem

General Elementary Direct Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

An elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

A Geometric Proof of Fermat’s Little Theorem

An Elementary and Simple Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

The lost proof of Fermat's last theorem

One curious proof of Fermat's little theorem

Did have Fermat the solution? An elementary proof of his Last Theorem

Diophantine Equations and Fermat’s Last Theorem for Multivariate (Skew-)Polynomials

Fermat's Last Theorem for regular primes

A new generalization of Fermat's Last Theorem

Fermat's Last Theorem: Algebra, Geometry, and Number Theory

Fermat's Last Theorem: Algebra and Number Theory

The Cartesian method and Fermat's Last Theorem

Fibonacci numbers and Fermat's last theorem

Fermat's Last Theorem-Wiles'Last Proofs

Fermat’s Little Theorem via Divisibility of Newton’s Binomial

A Quixotic Proof of Fermat's Two Squares Theorem for Prime Numbers

Windmills of the minds: an algorithm for Fermat's Two Squares Theorem

Yet another Proof of an old Hat

Sur le théorème de Fermat sur ${\bf Q}(\sqrt{5})$