Abstract:Solid solution strengthening is a well‐known strengthening mechanism for the 4xxx (Al‐Si alloys), 5xxx (Al‐Mg alloys), and 6xxx (Al–Mg–Si alloys). The distribution of solute atoms plays an important role in optimisation of the mechanical properties (increasing both the strength and ductility) of the alloys. While the distribution of solute atoms in the solid solution generally is assumed to be homogenous, solute clusters formed from randomly distributed solute atoms challenges this general assumption. Both dilute Al alloys (Al–Mg, Al–Si, and Al–Mg–Si) were solution treated at 450°C for 2 h and then quenched in room‐temperature water. They were analysed by atom probe tomography and these data have been employed in order to assess the 3D distribution of solute atoms in the solid solutions. The effects of the 3D distribution of solute atoms on the solid solution strengthening were also examined by mechanical testing (microhardness, tensile testing). An innovative approach was to abstain from conventional logic of binary vs ternary alloys in data analysis in favour of a less‐concentrated vs more‐concentrated strategy. This approach enables for the first time the integration of first principles Condon‐Morse atomic interaction effects, APT, and mechanical testing, which resulted in a novel empirical singleton‐cluster plot. The plot allows differentiation between singletons, solute clusters, and co‐clusters as well as between the less‐concentrated and more‐concentrated alloys. The plot also allows determination of the maximal yield strengths from cluster strengthening and from singletons in the absence of clustering. Most critically, this new approach in data analysis allows for the first time the determination of the d max based on experimental results. The APT statistical data analysis and the materials properties are underpinned by the newly identified differentiating roles of field, proximity, chemical, and atomic size effects on the distribution and homogeneity of the singletons and solute clusters. The singleton strengthening of the less concentrated dilute binary alloys is dominated by the field effect while cluster strengthening of the more concentrated dilute binary alloy inevitably is dominated by the proximity effect. In contrast, the co‐cluster strengthening of the less and more concentrated dilute ternary alloys involves a transition that is dependent largely on the dominance of the chemical effect over the proximity effect . A singular observation from these data is that the more concentrated dilute binary alloy exhibit simultaneous increases in both strength and ductility. Finally, the data for ductility and number densities of singletons and clusters suggests the dominant role of the proximity effect over that of the field and chemical effects. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Effect of Alloying Elements, Solutionizing Time and Quenching Media on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of 413-Based Alloys

Effect of solution heat treatment on the internal architecture and compressive strength of an AlMg4.7Si8 alloy

The Effect of Solution Treatment on the Si Particles’ Morphology Evolution and the Thermal Conductivity and Tensile Properties of Sb-Modified Al-8Si-0.6Mg Alloys

Effect of Multistage Solid Solution Treatment on Microstructure and Properties of Al-6.5Si-5.5Cu-0.2Zr-0.01Sr-0.06Ti-0.2Y Alloy

Effect of Alloying Elements and Processing Parameters on Microstructure and Properties of 1XXX Aluminium Alloys

Effects of Solution Treatment on Microstructure Transformation, Tensile and Exfoliation Corrosion Properties of 7136 Aluminum Alloy

Effect of Solution and Aging Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al–14Si–5Cu–1.1Mg–2.3Ni–0.3La Alloy

Effect of Solid Solution System on the Properties of Al-6.5Si-5.5Cu-0.2Zr-0.01Sr-0.06Ti-0.2Ce Alloy in the Aging State

Effects of heat treatment and testing temperature on the tensile properties of Al–Cu and Al–Cu–Si based alloys

Effects of Adding Trace Modification Elements and Heat Treatment on the Strength and Toughness of AlSi8Cu2MgMn Alloy

Effect of Solution Temperature and Quench Delay on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of an Extruded Al-Mg-Si-Cu-Mn alloy

Effect of heat treatments on microstructure and mechanical properties of sand cast Al–2Li–2Cu–0.5Mg–0.2Sc–0.2Zr alloy

Effect of the Solid Solution and Aging Treatment on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of a Novel Al-Mg-Si Alloy

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cast Al-Si-Cu-Mg-Ni-Cr Alloys: Effects of Time and Temperature on Two-Stage Solution Treatment and Ageing

Effect of multi-stage solution on microstructure and properties of Al–10.5Zn–2.05Mg–1.02Cu–0.2Zr–0.923Ti alloy extrusion

Alloying Elements Effects on Electrical Conductivity and Mechanical Properties of Newly Fabricated Al Based Alloys Produced by Conventional Casting Process

Effect of CuO Nanostructure Addition and Cooling Rate on the Microstructure and Mechanical Characteristics of Hypoeutectic Al-2wt.%Si Alloy

Alloying effect of Mg on microstructure and mechanical properties at 300 °C of Al–5Cu–1Mn–0.5Ni heat-resistant alloy

Influence of Solution Treatment Time on Precipitation Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Mg-2.0Nd-2.0Sm-0.4Zn-0.4Zr Alloy

Effect of Solution Treatment Time on Microstructure Evolution and Properties of Mg-3Y-4Nd-2Al Alloy

First‐Principles Design of Alloy Systems, Part I: Effects of Solute Type, Concentration, and Distribution on Alloying and Mechanical Properties – As‐Quenched Dilute Al (Mg, Si) Alloys