Acute Healing Outcomes in Paediatric Partial Thickness Burns Using Epiprotect® and Biobrane®: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Ameer Khamise,Hadas Lapid,Ankit Mishra,Alexandra Mary Murray
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.026
IF: 3.022
2024-06-03
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Abstract:Summary Aim To compare the acute healing outcomes of Biobrane® and Epiprotect® in paediatric partial thickness (PT) burns. Methods All paediatric patients (age <18) with PT burns managed with either Biobrane® or Epiprotect® over a five-year period at our burns unit were included. The primary outcome was time to complete healing. Secondary outcomes included adherence, infection rates, length of hospital stay, duration of acute follow-up, and return to the theatre. Results Of the 99 patients included, 38 received Epiprotect® and 61 received Biobrane®. The mean Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) was 6% (range 1-15%), and the median age was 21 months (range 5-169 months). Median time to healing in the Epiprotect® group was 19.5 days and 16 days inf the Biobrane® group (P=.14). The median hospitalisation length was the same for both products (2 days, P=.85). Infection rate was lower in the Epiprotect® group (2.6% vs 16.4%, P=.048). There was no difference in adherence rate. These trends were preserved when depth sub-groups were analysed. Adherence and infection rates were not affected by post-operative antibiotics (P>.99 and P=.65, respectively) in either group. The rate of return to theatre for further surgery was 13.2% for both products (P=1). Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that acute healing outcomes with Epiprotect® in paediatric PT burns are comparable to those with Biobrane®, with significantly lower infection rates for Epiprotect® in particular. These results suggest that Epiprotect® is a viable alternative to Biobrane®. Nevertheless, further prospective randomised studies are required to investigate both short- and long-term outcomes.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?