Abstract:Abstract Introduction In August of 2020, our institution transitioned from porcine xenograft to a polylactic acid skin substitute for the management of pediatric partial thickness burns. This change in treatment was due to the discontinuation of porcine xenograft by the primary supplier to the United States. We sought to make a length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain score, postoperative dressing change, and cost analysis of the polylactic acid skin substitute as compared to porcine xenograft for the treatment of pediatric burns. Methods Patients were identified using an institutional Burn Center registry and linked to clinical and administrative data. All pediatric patients admitted between January 1st, 2019 and March 31st, 2021 who sustained partial thickness burns were eligible for inclusion. LOS, burn etiology, total burn surface area (TBSA), postoperative pain scores, postoperative dressing changes, complications, infections, and hospital cost were evaluated. Results A total of 259 patients were identified, 47 of whom received the polylactic acid skin substitute and 212 of whom received xenograft. Average age for polylactic acid skin substitute patients was 5.4 years with 51.1% male, average age for xenograft patients was 4.6 years with 58.5% male. Average LOS for polylactic acid skin substitute patients was 3.4 days and 3.2 days for xenograft patients (p = 0.45). Etiology of burns was 83.0% scald and 10.6% flame for polylactic acid skin substitute patients and 80.2% scald and 9.40% flame for xenograft patients (p = 0.66 and p = 0.71, respectively). Polylactic acid skin substitute patients had an average TBSA of 5.3% and xenograft patients an average TBSA of 4.3% (p = 0.11). Postoperative pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 1 were 1.1 for polylactic acid skin substitute and 1.2 for xenograft (p = 0.13). Average number of inpatient postoperative dressing changes was equivalent between the polylactic acid skin substitute and xenograft (p = 0.62), while average day of first postoperative dressing change was POD 10.9 for the polylactic acid skin substitute and POD 9.9 for xenograft (p = 0.15). Neither group had postoperative infections, though xenograft had a complication rate of 1% with 2 patients while the polylactic acid skin substitute had 0%. Polylactic acid skin substitute patients had an average hospital cost of $28,415 and xenograft patients an average of $27,935 (p = 0.80). Conclusions A polylactic acid skin substitute is equivalent to porcine xenograft in LOS, postoperative pain, postoperative dressing changes, and cost in the setting of similar age, burn etiology, and %TBSA. More analysis with wound healing indices and safety profiles could determine the clinically superior choice.

Porcine Xenograft and Epidermal Fully Synthetic Skin Substitutes in the Treatment of Partial-Thickness Burns: A Literature Review

90 Efficacy of Porcine Skin Xenotransplants Indistinguishable from Allograft in First-in-human Clinical Evaluation

[Use of Heterogeneous Acelluar Dermal Matrix and Autologous Overthin Split-Thickness Skin for Repair of Deep Burn at Articular Sites].

91 Comparison of a Polylactic Acid Skin Substitute to Porcine Xenograft for Pediatric Partial Thickness Burns

Transplantation of microskin autografts with overlaid selectively decellularized split-thickness porcine skin in the repair of deep burn wounds

Porcine Transgenic, Acellular Material as an Alternative for Human Skin

Vital, Porcine, Gal-Knockout Skin Transplants Provide Efficacious Temporary Closure of Full-Thickness Wounds: Good Laboratory Practice-Compliant Studies in Nonhuman Primates

804 First-in-Human Xenotransplantation US-FDA-Clinical Trials - Complete Wound Closure of Mixed-Depth Burns via Porcine Skin Xenotransplant

[Comparative Study on Repair of Full-Thickness Burn Wound with Different Artificial Dermal Stent in Pigs].

Comparison of Intact Fish Skin Graft and Allograft as Temporary Coverage for Full-Thickness Burns: A Non-Inferiority Study

Efficacy and Safety of Viable Selective Germline Genome Edited Pigs Skin Xenotransplants in Patients with Thermal Burns

Engineered Skin Substitutes in Dermatologic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Transplanted acellular allograft dermal matrix. Potential as a template for the reconstruction of viable dermis

Skin substitutes with noncultured autologous skin cell suspension heal porcine full‐thickness wounds in a one‐stage procedure

[The Clinical Application of Xenogenic (porcine) Acellular Dermal Matrix Grafting with Thin Autogenic Skin on Deep Wounds].

Keratin-Alginate Sponges Support Healing of Partial-Thickness Burns

Skin Substitutes and Wound Healing: Current Status and Challenges

Clinical application and long-term follow-up study of porcine acellular dermal matrix combined with autoskin grafting

Comparison of Skin Substitutes for Acute and Chronic Wound Management

Outcomes of dermal substitutes in burns and burn scar reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Accelerated epithelialization and improved wound healing metrics in porcine full-thickness wounds transplanted with full-thickness skin micrografts