A Large-Scale Study of the Relationship Between Degree and Type of Hearing Loss and Recognition of Speech in Quiet and Noise

Michael L Smith,Matthew B Winn,Matthew B Fitzgerald,Michael L. Smith,Matthew B. Winn,Matthew B. Fitzgerald
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001484
2024-02-24
Ear & Hearing
Abstract:Speech-recognition testing is a standard part of audiometric assessment, along with pure-tone audiometry, measurement of tympanometry, and acoustic reflexes. Following refinements in word-recognition tasks in the late 1940s ( Hudgins et al. 1947 ; Egan 1948 ) and 1960s ( Peterson & Lehiste 1962 ; Tillman & Carhart 1966 ), the default test of speech recognition in audiometric assessment has been word recognition in quiet (WRQ; Dennis et al. 2004 ; American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2006 ; Katz et al. 2015 ). While this measure has been consistently used in clinical audiology for decades, it is widely known that patients with hearing loss consistently report difficulties understanding speech in the presence of noise ( Pichora-Fuller 1997 ; Gatehouse & Noble 2004 ; Hannula et al. 2011 ; Le Prell & Clavier 2017 ). Difficulties in background noise have been recognized as the dominant concern of patients with hearing loss, as established by patients directly stating difficulty in background noise ( Jorgensen & Novak 2020 ; Carr & Kihm 2022 ), even with the use of amplification ( Picou 2020 ). In a survey of factors that affect satisfaction with hearing aids, the leading response was wanting more benefits from their devices in noisy environments ( Manchaiah et al. 2021 ), and patients reported that they were willing to pay more for a hearing aid that has better functionality in noise ( Bridges et al. 2012 ). There is a clear need to address the concerns that patients report as being important, even if it involves a departure from conventional practice.
otorhinolaryngology,audiology & speech-language pathology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?