Abstract:Objectives: The objectives of the study were to (1) evaluate the impact of hearing loss on children's ability to benefit from F0 differences between target/masker speech in the context of aided speech-in-speech recognition and (2) to determine whether compromised F0 discrimination associated with hearing loss predicts F0 benefit in individual children. We hypothesized that children wearing appropriately fitted amplification would benefit from F0 differences, but they would not show the same magnitude of benefit as children with normal hearing. Reduced audibility and poor suprathreshold encoding that degrades frequency discrimination were expected to impair children's ability to segregate talkers based on F0. Design: Listeners were 9 to 17 year olds with bilateral, symmetrical, sensorineural hearing loss ranging in degree from mild to severe. A four-alternative, forced-choice procedure was used to estimate thresholds for disyllabic word recognition in a 60-dB-SPL two-talker masker. The same male talker produced target and masker speech. Target words had either the same mean F0 as the masker or were digitally shifted higher than the masker by three, six, or nine semitones. The F0 benefit was defined as the difference in thresholds between the shifted-F0 conditions and the unshifted-F0 condition. Thresholds for discriminating F0 were also measured, using a three-alternative, three-interval forced choice procedure, to determine whether compromised sensitivity to F0 differences due to hearing loss would predict children's ability to benefit from F0. Testing was performed in the sound field, and all children wore their personal hearing aids at user settings. Results: Children with hearing loss benefited from an F0 difference of nine semitones between target words and masker speech, with older children generally benefitting more than younger children. Some children benefitted from an F0 difference of six semitones, but this was not consistent across listeners. Thresholds for discriminating F0 improved with increasing age and predicted F0 benefit in the nine-semitone condition. An exploratory analysis indicated that F0 benefit was not significantly correlated with the four-frequency pure-tone average (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz), aided audibility, or consistency of daily hearing aid use, although there was a trend for an association with the low-frequency pure-tone average (0.25 and 0.5 kHz). Comparisons of the present data to our previous study of children with normal hearing demonstrated that children with hearing loss benefitted less than children with normal hearing for the F0 differences tested. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that children with mild-to-severe hearing loss who wear hearing aids benefit from relatively large F0 differences between target and masker speech during aided speech-in-speech recognition. The size of the benefit increases with increasing age, consistent with previously reported age effects for children with normal hearing. However, hearing loss reduces children's ability to capitalize on F0 differences between talkers. Audibility alone does not appear to be responsible for this effect; aided audibility and degree of loss were not primary predictors of performance. The ability to benefit from F0 differences may be limited by immature central processing or aspects of peripheral encoding that are not characterized in standard clinical assessments.

Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss

Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech

Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v.5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users

Spatial Hearing in Children With and Without Hearing Loss: Where and What the Speech Is Matters for Local Speech Intelligibility

Adaptive Hearing Aid Benefit in Children With Mild/Moderate Hearing Loss: A Registered, Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

Short-Term Pediatric Acclimatization to Adaptive Hearing Aid Technology

Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss

Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit

Tolerable delay for speech production and perception: effects of hearing ability and experience with hearing aids

Performance of hybrid gain formula versus traditional fitting formulas in hearing aid fitting in tinnitus patients with hearing loss

Effect of Age and Unaided Acoustic Hearing on Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users' Ability to Distinguish Yes/No Statements and Questions

Amplitude Modulation Perception and Cortical Evoked Potentials in Children With Listening Difficulties and Their Typically Developing Peers

Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort

Performance with an adaptive frequency response hearing aid in a sample of elderly hearing-impaired listeners

Clinical procedure for selecting the frequency response and level of amplification for hearing‐impaired adults: a progress report

Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users

A Step Toward Precision Audiology: Individual Differences and Characteristic Profiles From Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities

A Large-Scale Study of the Relationship Between Degree and Type of Hearing Loss and Recognition of Speech in Quiet and Noise

Amplification Effects on the Acoustic Change Complex in Older Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Benefit of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Signal Enhancement for Speech Reception in Complex Listening Situations

Hearing Impairment: Reduced Pupil Dilation Response and Frontal Activation During Degraded Speech Perception