Abstract:Speech audiometry in noise based on sentence tests is an important diagnostic tool to assess listeners’ speech recognition threshold (SRT), i.e., the signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to 50% intelligibility. The clinical standard measurement procedure requires a professional experimenter to record and evaluate the response (expert-conducted speech audiometry). The use of automatic speech recognition enables self-conducted measurements with an easy-to-use speech-based interface. This article compares self-conducted SRT measurements using smart speakers with expert-conducted laboratory measurements. With smart speakers, there is no control over the absolute presentation level, potential errors from the automated response logging, and room acoustics. We investigate the differences between highly controlled measurements in the laboratory and smart speaker-based tests for young normal-hearing (NH) listeners as well as for elderly NH, mildly and moderately hearing-impaired listeners in low, medium, and highly reverberant room acoustics. For the smart speaker setup, we observe an overall bias in the SRT result that depends on the hearing loss. The bias ranges from +0.7 dB for elderly moderately hearing-impaired listeners to +2.2 dB for young NH listeners. The intrasubject standard deviation is close to the clinical standard deviation (0.57/0.69 dB for the young/elderly NH compared with 0.5 dB observed for clinical tests and 0.93/1.09 dB for the mild/moderate hearing-impaired listeners compared with 0.9 dB). For detecting a clinically elevated SRT, the speech-based test achieves an area under the curve value of 0.95 and therefore seems promising for complementing clinical measurements.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to achieve automated speech audiometry in the home environment through smart speakers, especially to measure the Speech Recognition Threshold (SRT), that is, the signal - to - noise ratio required to reach 50% comprehension in noise. Specifically, the research aims to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of self - testing using smart speakers and compare it with the professional test results in the laboratory environment. ### Key issues: 1. **Early diagnosis of the hearing - impaired population**: Traditional speech audiometry requires professional experimenters to record and evaluate the responses of subjects, which limits its popularity. Smart speakers can achieve self - testing through the voice interface, improving the accessibility and convenience of the test. 2. **Applicability to individuals with different hearing levels**: The research examined the applicability of smart speaker tests to young normal - hearing individuals, elderly normal - hearing individuals, and those with mild and moderate hearing impairments, especially under different room acoustic conditions. 3. **Reliability of the automated speech recognition system**: Smart speakers rely on the Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system to record the responses of subjects. The research evaluated the accuracy and potential errors of this system under different conditions. ### Research methods: - **Testing tools**: Use the German matrix sentence test OLSA as a basis, which is a widely - used speech audiometry tool. - **Testing environment**: Three rooms with different acoustic conditions (living room, ordinary classroom, concert hall) were simulated in the laboratory to evaluate the influence of different acoustic environments on the test results. - **Subject grouping**: Include four groups of subjects: young normal - hearing individuals, elderly normal - hearing individuals, those with mild hearing impairments, and those with moderate hearing impairments. - **Data comparison**: Compare the test results of smart speakers with the professional test results in the laboratory, and analyze the differences and consistencies between the two. ### Main findings: - The smart speaker test results showed an overall deviation, which depends on the degree of hearing loss, ranging from + 0.7 dB (elderly with moderate hearing impairment) to + 2.2 dB (young normal - hearing individuals). - The within - group standard deviation of subjects with different hearing levels is close to the clinical standard deviation, indicating that the smart speaker test has a certain degree of reliability. - Through ROC curve analysis, the smart speaker test showed high accuracy in detecting clinically elevated SRT (AUC value of 0.95), showing its potential as a supplementary tool for clinical tests. In conclusion, this research demonstrates the feasibility and potential of smart speakers for speech audiometry in the home environment, especially in the early screening of hearing loss, and is expected to lower the threshold for the provision of hearing - aid devices.

Speech Audiometry at Home: Automated Listening Tests via Smart Speakers With Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Automated Measurement of Speech Recognition, Reaction Time, and Speech Rate and Their Relation to Self-Reported Listening Effort for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using various Maskers

A Statistical Method for the Analysis of Speech Intelligibility Tests

Feasibility of an Adaptive Version of the Everyday Conversational Sentences in Noise Test

On the Feasibility of Using Behavioral Listening Effort Test Methods to Evaluate Auditory Performance in Cochlear Implant Users

Objective Prediction of Hearing Aid Benefit Across Listener Groups Using Machine Learning: Speech Recognition Performance With Binaural Noise-Reduction Algorithms

Global access to speech hearing tests

Automated Speech Audiometry: Can It Work Using Open-Source Pre-Trained Kaldi-NL Automatic Speech Recognition?

Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head

Interleaved Acoustic Environments: Impact of an Auditory Scene Classification Procedure on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

A Large-Scale Study of the Relationship Between Degree and Type of Hearing Loss and Recognition of Speech in Quiet and Noise

Speech-in-Noise Assessment in the Routine Audiologic Test Battery: Relationship to Perceived Auditory Disability

Evaluating Spatial Hearing Using a Dual-Task Approach in a Virtual-Acoustics Environment

Remote self-testing for adult cochlear implant users: the effect of wireless streaming on speech recognition in noise

Individual Aided Speech-Recognition Performance and Predictions of Benefit for Listeners With Impaired Hearing Employing FADE

German Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children: A Useful Speech Audiometry Tool for Hearing-Impaired Children at Kindergarten and School Age

Speech-in-noise testing: Innovative applications for pediatric patients, underrepresented populations, fitness for duty, clinical trials, and remote services

Exploring the feasibility of remote administration of speech audiometry: A comparative study of conventional and digital methods

Assessing Speech Audibility via Syllabic-Rate Neural Responses in Adults and Children With and Without Hearing Loss

Validation of an Automated Speech Analysis of Cognitive Tasks within a Semiautomated Phone Assessment