Accuracy of the CAD/CAM technique compared with the conventional technique used for stand-alone genioplasty

J. Rustemeyer,C. Spatny
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.02.002
IF: 2.986
2024-02-25
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abstract:The benefit of the computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique for stand-alone genioplasty remains uncertain and was evaluated in this study. Patients who underwent a conventional genioplasty ( n = 20) or genioplasty with the CAD/CAM technique ( n = 20), and for whom cephalometry and photogrammetry were performed before and 6 months after surgery, were included. Deviations from predictions of the soft tissue pogonion (Pg′), lip inferior point to aesthetic line (Li–Esth), facial convexity angle (FCA), mentolabial angle (MLA), and ratios of soft to hard tissue movements were calculated. No significant deviation was observed for Pg′ in either the conventional group (3.85 ± 4.36 mm; 1.91 ± 1.11 mm) or CAD/CAM group (1.28 ± 1.16 mm; 2.81 ± 3.08 mm), for horizontal and vertical movements, respectively. However, for forward movement, deviation from the prediction of Pg ́ in the CAD/CAM group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group ( P = 0.015). Deviations of Li–Esth, MLA, and FCA did not differ significantly between the groups. No definite preference for the CAD/CAM technique could be established, because deviations from predictions were not significant in either of the technique groups and lay within the clinically acceptable range.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?