Abstract:BACKGROUND:Traditionally, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was used to evaluate exercise response of patients with asthma; however, patients obviously had panting after exercise, so FEV1 was affected commonly. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a new technique for measuring respiratory impedance that do not require maximal inspiration and forced expiration.OBJECTIVE: To study airway resistance with IOS before and after exercise in healthy and asthmatic patients and investigate the significance of exercise excitation and IOS assessment.DESIGN: Synchronically non-randomized case contrast study.SETTING: Department of Respiratory Medicine, East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 14 male patients with bronchial asthma who were regarded as the asthmatic group were selected from Department of Respiratory Medicine of Shanghai East Hospital from January to October 2006. They were in a clinical stationary phase. Another 14 male healthy subjects were selected as the control group and ages of all subjects ranged from 29 to 50 years. All subjects provided the confirmed consent.METHODS: IOS was used to measure basic value of respiratory resistance, and then subjects underwent exercise challenge. Nose of subjects was clipped breathing through mouth. Within 3-4 minutes, heart rate was increased to 90% and maintained for 6 minutes during challenge. Respiratory resistance was repeatedly measured at 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes after exercise, including airway hyperresponse (AHR), total respiratory resistance, central resistance, peripheral resistance and resonance frequency at 5, 20 and 35 Hz of pulse frequency, elasrtic resistance and inertia resistance (X5 and X35) at 5 and 10 Hz of pulse frequency. In addition, difference of AHR at 5 and 35 Hz was calculated, and change ratios of both Rcentral and Rperipheral were calculated as (highest value after exercise-baseline value)/baseline value × 100%.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Basic value of respiratory resistance by using IOS and exercise challenge test.RESULTS: All 14 patients with bronchial asthma and 14 healthy subjects were involved in the final analysis. Peripheral resistance (Rperiphera) was significantly higher than central resistance (Rcentral) in asthmatic patients (P ＜ 0.01). The maximal increase of respiratory impedance occurred from 5 minutes to 10 minutes after exercise in asthmatics. Resonance frequency (Fres) of asthmatics before and after exercise was significantly increased than that of controls (P ＜ 0.01).Change ratios of Fres from asthmatics were higher than that from control group (P ＜ 0.01). After challenge, R5, R5-R20,Zrespir and X5 from asthmatics changed significantly than that from controls (P ＜ 0.01). The increment change value of After exercise Zrespir increased significantly, because obstruction of small bronchi during expiration and impedance increased abruptly. Air trapping was expressed in VT-Zrespir graph in 57.1% patients. There was no difference in the VT-Zrespir graph of controls before and after exercise.CONCLUSION: The main site of airflow obstruction was in small airways in asthmatics after exercise challenge. The general acceptance of IOS method was good among the asthmatic patients. The airway response of exercise challenge may be assessed more accurately with IOS that do not require a maximal inspiration and forced expiration.

Comparison of impulse oscillometry measurements according to body mass index in patients with asthma

The influence of body mass index on airway resistance in children with sickle cell disease: A longitudinal study based on impulse oscillometry

Respiratory impedance assessed with impulse oscillometry in measuring exercise response of asthmatic patients

Application of Impulse Oscillometry in Adult Asthmatic Patients With Preserved Lung Function

Comparison of Forced and Impulse Oscillometry Measurements: A Clinical Population and Printed Airway Model Study

Evaluation of exercise response in asthmatics: Impulse oscillometry in measurement of respiratory impedance

I Say IOS You Say AOS: Comparative Bias in Respiratory Impedance Measurements

The role of oscillometry in asthma

Role of impulse oscillometry in diagnosis and follow-up in bronchial asthma

Differences between oscillometry measurements obtained by MostGraph-01 and MasterScreen-IOS in patients with asthma

Comparison of Oscillometry with Lung Function Parameters between Bronchial Asthma with Airflow Obstruction and COPD Patients

Preschool Impulse Oscillometry Predicts Active Asthma and Impaired Lung Function at School Age

Impulse oscillometry in the assessment of children's lung function

Lung function testing assessment by impulse oscillometry in chronic lung disease

Baseline Impulse Oscillometry Metrics Differentiate Asthmatic Children From Non‐Asthmatic Children Across Ethnicity/Race: A Meta‐Analysis

Impulse oscillometry: The state-of-art for lung function testing

Impulse oscillometry bronchodilator response in preschool children

Small-airway Dysfunction among Non-Cystic Bronchiectasis Patients with Different Bronchiectasis Severity Index

Prevalence and features of IOS-defined small airway disease across asthma severities

Clinical Value of Impulse Oscillometry in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diagnosis and evaluation of small airway disease and COPD using impulse oscillometry