Respiratory impedance assessed with impulse oscillometry in measuring exercise response of asthmatic patients

梁永杰,郭忠良,蔡映云
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:0254-1424.2000.06.011
2000-01-01
Abstract:Objective Approximately 80%~90% of asthma sufferers experience exercise induced bronchoconstriction. The response is assessed with spirometry (FEV 1) traditionally. Because the patients usually have shortness of breath after exercise challenge, the measurement with FEV 1 may be not accurate. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a new technique for measuring respiratory impedance that does not require maximal inspiration and force expiration. Respiratory impedance was assessed with IOS for pathophysiology of exerciseinduced asthma. Methods Respiratory impedance measured with IOS (MasterScreen, Jeager, Germany) in 14 healthy volunteers and 14 asthmatics was as baseline value at first. The procedure of exercise challenge with an ergometer (Corival 300 Gould Co) increased heart rate to 90% of predicted maximum values in 3~4 min and maintained for 6 min. After the challenge, measurement with IOS was made immediately at 5min intervals for 5 times. Results The maximal increase of respiratory impedance occurred at 5~10 min after exercise and the increment magnitude of peripheral resistance ( 99.6 %) was more than that of central resistance ( 13.5 %) in asthmatics. During challenge,the subject's nose was clipped breathing room air through mouth.After challenge, R5, R5-R20, Zrespir, resonance frequency (Fres) and X5 from patients changed significantly. The increment of R5-R20 from all asthmatics≥ 0.032 kPa/L·s(2s beyond the mean response of nonasthmatics). The change ratio of X5 from 71.4 % asthmatics ≥41% (2s beyond the mean response of nonasthmatics). Air trapping was expressed in V TZrespir graph in 57.1 % patients. Conclusion The main site of airflow obstruction was in small airways in asthmatics after exercise challenge. The general acceptance of IOS method was good among the asthmatic patients. The airway response of exercise challenge may be assessed more accurately with IOS,which dose not require a maximal inspiration and forced expiration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?