Within-breath oscillometry for identifying exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in pediatric patients reporting symptoms with exercise

Mario Barreto,Chiara Veneroni,Mariaclaudia Caiulo,Melania Evangelisti,Pasquale Pio Pompilio,Maria Cristina Mazzuca,Giorgia Raponi,Jacopo Pagani,Pasquale Parisi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1324413
IF: 3.569
2024-01-12
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Abstract:Background: Evaluating oscillometry parameters separately for the inspiratory and expiratory breath phases and their within-breath differences can help to identify exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in pediatric outpatients disclosing exercise-induced symptoms (EIS). Aims: To assess the response in impedance parameters following an exercise challenge in patients reporting EIS. Methods: Sixty-eight patients reporting EIS (34 asthmatics and 34 suspected of asthma, age mean = 10.8 years, range = 6.0–16.0) underwent an incremental treadmill exercise test. Spirometry was performed at baseline and 1, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-min post exercise. Oscillometry was performed at baseline and at 3- and 18-min post exercise. Bronchodilator response to 200 μg albuterol was then assessed. EIB was defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) fall ≥10% from baseline. Expiratory and inspiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs), their z -score (Ducharme et al. 2022), and their mean within-breath differences (ΔRrs = Rrs exp -Rrs insp , ΔXrs =Xrs exp -Xrs insp ) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and their areas (AUCs) were used to evaluate impedance parameters' performances in classifying EIB. Results: Asthmatic patients developed EIB more frequently than those suspected of asthma [18/34 (52.9%) vs. 2/34 (5.9%), p < 0.001]. In the 20 subjects with EIB, Rrs insp , Rrs exp , Xrs insp , and Xrs exp peaked early (3'), and remained steady except for Xrs insp, which recovered faster afterward. ΔXrs widened 18 min following the exercise and reversed sharply after bronchodilation (BD) (−1.81 ± 1.60 vs. −0.52 ± 0.80 cmH 2 O × s/L, p < 0.001). Cutoffs for EIB leading to the highest AUCs were a rise of 0.41 in z -score Rrs insp (Se: 90.0%, Sp: 66.7%), and a fall of −0.64 in z -score Xrs insp (Se: 90.0%, Sp: 75.0%). Accepting as having "positive" postexercise oscillometry changes those subjects who had both z -scores beyond respective cutoffs, sensitivity for EIB was 90.0% (18/20) and specificity, 83.3% (40/48). Conclusion: Oscillometry parameters and their within-breath differences changed markedly in pediatric patients presenting EIB and were restored after the bronchodilator. Strong agreement between z -scores of inspiratory oscillometry parameters and spirometry supports their clinical utility, though larger studies are required to validate these findings in a broader population.
pediatrics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?