Abstract:Compared to conventional monoethanolamine (MEA), alternative solvents are expected to substantially contribute to reduce the energy demand of post-combustion CO 2 capture from flue gases. This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of a 27 wt% 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) + 13 wt% piperazine (PZ) aqueous solution for CO 2 capture, compared to a 30 wt% MEA solution. The study addresses the retrofit of a carbon capture unit to a biomass-fired combined heat and power (CHP) plant, effectively making it a bioenergy with a carbon capture and storage (BECCS) system. The treated flue gas has a flow rate of 23 tons/hour (t/h) with 11.54 vol% CO 2 and a 90% capture rate is aimed for. Aspen Plus V14 was employed for process simulations. Initially, binary interaction parameters for AMP/PZ, AMP/H 2 O, and PZ/H 2 O are regressed using vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) data, which were retrieved from literature along with reaction kinetics. Validation of parameters from available experimental literature yields an average absolute relative deviation (AARD) of only 5.9%. Afterwards, a process simulation model is developed and validated against experimental data from a reference pilot plant, using a similar AMP/PZ blend, resulting in 5% AARD. Next, a sensitivity analysis optimizes operating conditions, including solvent rate, absorber/stripper packing heights, and stripper pressure, based on regeneration energy impact. Optimized results, compared to MEA, reveal that AMP/PZ reduces the energy consumption from 3.61 to 2.86 GJ/tCO 2 . The retrofitting of the capture unit onto the selected CHP plant is examined through the development of a dedicated model. Two control strategies are compared to address energy unavailability for supplying the capture unit. The analysis spans 4 months, selected to account for seasonal variations. At nominal capacity, CO 2 emissions, rendered negative by biomass combustion and CO 2 capture, reach a maximum of −3.4 tCO 2 /h compared to 0.36 tCO 2 /h before retrofitting. Depending on the control strategy and CHP plant operating point, the Specific Primary Energy Consumption for CO 2 Avoided (SPECCA) ranges from 4.91 MJ/kgCO 2 to 1.76 MJ/kgCO 2 . Finally, an economic comparison based on systematic methodology reveals a 7.87% reduction in capture cost favoring the AMP/PZ blend. Together, these findings highlight AMP/PZ as a highly favorable alternative solvent.

Energy, exergy, environmental and economic analysis of solvent-based post-combustion carbon capture for ethylene production

Heat Integration, Process Design and Techno-Economic Assessment of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Using Piperazine for Large-Scale Ethylene Plant

Techno-economic Evaluation of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Based on Chemical Absorption for the Thermal Cracking Furnace in Ethylene Manufacturing

Techno-economic analysis of AMP/PZ solvent for CO2 capture in a biomass CHP plant: towards net negative emissions

Post-combustion carbon capture process modeling, simulation, and assessment of synergistic effect of solvents

Optimizing post-combustion carbon capture: A comprehensive 3E analyses of energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic aspects with solar integration

Techno-economic analysis and optimisation of Piperazine-based Post-combustion carbon capture and CO 2 compression process for large-scale biomass-fired power plants through simulation

Novel Postcombustion Capture Process for CO2 from the Flue Gas of Coal-Fired Power Plants Using a Green Deep Eutectic Solvent

Ionic Liquid-Ethanol Mixed Solvent Design for the Post-Combustion Carbon Capture

Comparative Investigation of Different CO2 Capture Technologies for Coal to Ethylene Glycol Process

Assessment of electrified ethylene production via biomass gasification and electrochemical CO reduction

Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of CO2 Capture Processes Using Blended Amines

Industrial test of post combustion CO2 capture by reactive absorption with two new solvents in natural gas power plant

Molecular Mechanism and Absorption Performance Evaluation of CO2 Capture from the PCC Process by Monoethanolamine-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents

Energy-efficient Process Intensification for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture: A Modeling Approach

Experimental Study of the Absorption and Regeneration Performance of Several Candidate Solvents for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture

Integrated Capture and Conversion of CO2 to Methane using a Water-lean, Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Solvent.

Accounting for carbon capture solvent cost and energy demand in the energy system

Assessment of Hybrid Solvent—Membrane Configurations for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture for Super-Critical Power Plants

The Advances of Post-combustion CO2 Capture with Chemical Solvents: Review and Guidelines

MEA-based CO2 capture: a study focuses on MEA concentrations and process parameters