Abstract:A systematic component of wine quality is believed to depend on the geoclimatic factors of its production conditions. This belief has long motivated the development of geographical indications for wines. American viticulture areas (AVAs) represent the most common geographic identifier firms use to differentiate their products in the United States. In this paper we contribute new empirical evidence on the effectiveness and impact of GIs by studying consumers' valuation of US wine appellations within a structural model of wine demand. The model is rooted in the discrete‐choice framework, under the basic premise that observable information concerning wine attributes is credible and key to consumers' choices. Specifically, we develop a two‐level, nested‐logit model featuring many wine products and characteristics—including wine type, brands, and varietals, in addition to geographic origin. The model is estimated using NielsenIQ Consumer Panel data over the 2007–2019 period. We find that US consumers place a relatively high value on wines' geographic origins, distinct from the value of brand and varietal information, as documented by their marginal willingness to pay estimates. Furthermore, a counterfactual experiment shows significant welfare impacts from information about the geographic origin of wines. Over the period of interest, the welfare gain attributable to US geographic origin designation is estimated at about $5.37 billion, with wine producers and retailers capturing ~78% of this surplus. Virtually all consumer welfare gains are due to product differentiation and increased product variety enabled by information about the wine's origin.

Potable intellectual property: WTO TRIPS and EU geographical indication wines

The Compatibility of the European Union’s Geographical Indications Regulations for Wines with the World Trade Organization Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade

Getting Article 22(1) TRIPS Right: A Commentary on the Definition of ‘Geographical Indication’ from a European Union Perspective with a Focus on Wines

Geographical indications and welfare: Evidence from US wine demand

Assessing the role of geographical indications in affecting the quality of imports

Wine Geographical Indications and Product Specifications: A Case of Prosecco Quality and Characteristics?

Barriers to Wine Trade

Geographical Indications: Can China Reconcile the Irreconcilable Intellectual Property Issue Between EU and US?

WTO and the Viti-vinicultural Domain

Geographical indications as global knowledge commons: Ostrom's law on common intellectual property and collective action

Impact of Trade Agreements with the European Union on Wine Exports from the New-New World

New evidence on wine in French international trade (1848–1913): Import discrimination as export quality promotion

Wine: The punching bag in trade retaliation

European Integration Processes in the EU GI System—A Long-Term Review of EU Regulation for GIs

Rethinking Coexistence Between Prior Trademarks and Later Geographical Indications

Study on Food Security of Geographical Indications Supervised and Managed

Protection of Geographical Indications in China: Conflicts, Causes and Solutions

Comparative Study of State Jurisdiction: The Protection Towards Geographical Indication at Indonesia, the EU and US

Trade uncorked: Genetic distance and taste‐related barriers in wine trade

The role of climate and trade policies in the wine sector

Expanding Geographical Indication protection at any cost? A critique of the EU law of evocation