Expanding Geographical Indication protection at any cost? A critique of the EU law of evocation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2022.02.03

2023-02-01

Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property

Abstract:As the major pillar of the EU's quality policy on agricultural products, Geographical Indications (GIs) are protected in the EU at a level significantly higher than in other jurisdictions. Through multilateral and bilateral negotiations, the EU aims to ensure a similar high protection level as is provided in other countries' national legislations, which has already generated much debate globally. This article focuses on a recent trend in the EU for further enhancing the level of GI protection. By way of reviewing the CJEU's application of the EU GI regulations that protect GIs against evocation, this article reveals that the scope of GI protection has been extended greatly with an increasingly broad interpretation of evocation by the CJEU. It further traces the source of the evocation provision and examines potential rationales behind GI protection against evocation. It concludes that it lacks legislative tradition and solid justifications to expand the scope of GI protection via the evocation clause. Such a high level of GI protection against evocation, mostly driven by reasons of policy, will lead to a risk of monopoly of techniques and production of certain types of products, and is enforced at the cost of the freedom of communication, trade and industry of other agricultural operators in the EU. Moreover, non-EU countries need to understand the European approach to GI protection, particularly concerning the scope of protection, before they support or adopt it.

law