Abstract:Abstract Along with the internationally recognized image of Georgian wine and the increase of wine exports, special attention is paid to maintaining and improving the quality of Georgian wine. Taking into account the requirements of the local and international wine markets and, consequently, promoting the development of a competitive market remains a challenge for Georgian law. The creation of favorable conditions for the export of wine at the local and international level implies, first of all, the existence of legal regulations. The aim of the Law of Georgia on Vine and Wine and its accompanying subordinate normative acts is to develop a competitive wine market in Georgia and to protect the interests of consumers, to maintain and grow the international reputation of the Georgian viticulture and winemaking sector. The law was substantially amended in 2017 and the aim of the reform was to adapt to the challenges in the wine sector and bring it closer to international standards. At the same time, the export of Georgian wine to different countries is regulated by a different legal framework. Therefore, it is in our interest to analyze these different legal regulations, which have a direct impact on the opportunities for wine exports from Georgia - the incentive or obstacle to improving the quality of Georgian wine. EU regulations apply to both wines produced in the EU and imported to the EU market, as well as to Georgia, as a third country that has signed the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA) with the EU. Russia, Ukraine and the USA are important export markets for Georgia. Georgia has different international legal relations with each of them and, accordingly, the legal requirements for wine exports to these countries are different. The paper examines the current state of the modern Georgian wine market in the context of domestic and international norms regulating wine exports. It is analyzed whether local legislation and international agreements regulating wine exports contribute to the growth of Georgian wine exports and the improvement of wine quality.

The Compatibility of the European Union’s Geographical Indications Regulations for Wines with the World Trade Organization Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade

Potable intellectual property: WTO TRIPS and EU geographical indication wines

Getting Article 22(1) TRIPS Right: A Commentary on the Definition of ‘Geographical Indication’ from a European Union Perspective with a Focus on Wines

Rethinking Coexistence Between Prior Trademarks and Later Geographical Indications

Geographical Indications: Can China Reconcile the Irreconcilable Intellectual Property Issue Between EU and US?

Barriers to Wine Trade

Wine Geographical Indications and Product Specifications: A Case of Prosecco Quality and Characteristics?

The Protection of Traditional Foods in the EU: Traditional Specialities Guaranteed

The role played by the regime of collective and certification marks in the protection of geographical indications-Comparative study of law and practice in France, the EU and China

Expanding Geographical Indication protection at any cost? A critique of the EU law of evocation

Terroir and Trade War: Reforming China’s Legislation on Generic Terms Under the nfluence of the EU and US

European Integration Processes in the EU GI System—A Long-Term Review of EU Regulation for GIs

Geographical indications as global knowledge commons: Ostrom's law on common intellectual property and collective action

Impact of Trade Agreements with the European Union on Wine Exports from the New-New World

Protectionism in the Era of Globalisation: The Misuse of Anti-Dumping Instruments From an EU Perspective.

Protection of Geographical Indications in China: Conflicts, Causes and Solutions

Geographical Indications in Vietnam: Protection and Legal Issues

Recent Opportunities for Increasing Georgian Wine Export - Incentives or Obstacles to Improving Wine Quality

Comparative Study of State Jurisdiction: The Protection Towards Geographical Indication at Indonesia, the EU and US

Limitations of WTO Disputes Settlement Mechanism in Domestic Implementation of TRIPS Agreement

Assessing the role of geographical indications in affecting the quality of imports