Abstract:PurposeIn China, most quality assessments (QAs) of the high‐contrast resolution of medical computed tomography (CT) equipment is performed by subjective evaluation, which is simple but dependent on observer expertise. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and degree of dispersion of evaluation results from observers with different expertise and to develop an objective, easily understandable new approach to minimize the error caused by the subjective nature of observer evaluation. The accuracy and reproducibility of this new approach was validated and compared using both subjective and objective evaluation methods.MethodsThis new objective evaluation method of high‐contrast resolution was based on measurements of CT phantom images. The intensity profile of the aluminum line pairs’ (LPs’) images was extracted and quantified following the Rayleigh criterion. The interpolation method was employed to improve the consistency of the middle profile lines of each LP group for application of the Rayleigh criterion. With the introduction of a normalized margin, the accuracy of the results increased to the decimal level. Five junior observers and three QA professionals evaluated the high‐contrast resolution of three different CT scanners using the subjective method, modulation transfer function (MTF) method, and the new objective method, and the results were compared statistically.ResultsThe experimental standard deviations ranged from 0.4 LP/cm to 0.55 LP/cm for subjective visual inspection. The uncertainty of the expert group's results was much lower than that of the volunteer group. The experimental standard deviations of the MTF evaluation, according to both the standard deviation (SD) and point spread function (PSF) methods, were within the intervals of (0.04–0.06) LP/cm and (0.08–0.16) LP/cm, whereas that of the proposed objective evaluation method was approximately 0.02 LP/cm. The experimental data indicated that the results of the new objective evaluation were in accordance with those of the expert group's subjective evaluation and the MTF evaluation.ConclusionsIn this study, the subjective evaluation results from experienced observers showed relatively less uncertainty and more accuracy than those from inexperienced observers. Furthermore, a new objective evaluation approach that is easily understood, accurate, and reproducible was developed in this study. Results acquired using this new method were comparable with those of expert groups’ subjective evaluation and MTF evaluation. Specialized QA software that integrates the steps implemented in the new method is being developed to enhance the convenience of the approach and assist observers in obtaining accurate and replicable assessment results.

Assessment of cervical spine CT by an image quality audit using qualitative and quantitative methods

Study on the Optimized Scanning Conditions of Cerebral CT Angiography Based on the Angiographic CT Head Phantom

Experimental study of low-dose cervical CT scan and its clinical application

Clinical effectiveness of contrast medium injection protocols for 80-kV coronary and craniocervical CT angiography—a prospective multicenter observational study

Preliminary study of peripheral artery CT angiography with auto-tube current of different tube voltage and noise index

Improving the Safety of Computed Tomography Through Automated Quality Measurement: A Radiologist Reader Study of Radiation Dose, Image Noise, and Image Quality

Diagnostic Accuracy of CT for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression

Ranking the Relative Importance of Image Quality Features in CT by Consensus Survey

Objective image quality assurance in cone‐beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies

Quantitative analysis of the image quality in megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography

Clinical Value of Spiral CT Low-Dose Scan and Reconstruction in Cervical Spine

Comparison of image quality and diagnostic efficacy of routine clinical lumbar spine imaging at 0.55T and 1.5/3T

A Novel Objective Method for Assessing High-Contrast Spatial Resolution in CT Based on the Rayleigh Criterion.

Application of Artificial Intelligence-based Image Optimization for Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta With Low Tube Voltage and Reduced Contrast Medium Volume

Low-dose computed tomography perceptual image quality assessment

How subjective CT image quality assessment becomes surprisingly reliable: pairwise comparisons instead of Likert scale

Intraindividual Comparison of Dose Reduction and Coronary Calcium Scoring Accuracy Using Kilovolt-independent and Tin Filtration CT Protocols

Abstract TP138: Image Quality Assessment of Photon Counting Computed Tomography Angiography of the Head and Neck

Task-based image quality assessment of an intraoperative CBCT for spine surgery compared with conventional CT

Impact of reducing iodinated intravenous contrast volume in brain CT on image diagnostic quality

Qualitative and Quantitative Image Analysis of 16 Cm Wide-Coverage Computed Tomography Compared to New-Generation Dual-Source CT.