Abstract:Long term exposure to biased content in literature or media can significantly influence people's perceptions of reality, leading to the development of implicit biases that are difficult to detect and address (Gerbner 1998). In this study, we propose a novel method to analyze the differences in representation between two groups and use it examine the representation of African Americans and White Americans in books between 1850 to 2000 with the Google Books dataset (Goldberg and Orwant 2013). By developing better tools to understand differences in representation, we aim to contribute to the ongoing efforts to recognize and mitigate biases. To improve upon the more common phrase based (men, women, white, black, etc) methods to differentiate context (Tripodi et al. 2019, Lucy; Tadimeti, and Bamman 2022), we propose collecting a comprehensive list of historically significant figures and using their names to select relevant context. This novel approach offers a more accurate and nuanced method for detecting implicit biases through reducing the risk of selection bias. We create group representations for each decade and analyze them in an aligned semantic space (Hamilton, Leskovec, and Jurafsky 2016). We further support our results by assessing the time adjusted toxicity (Bassignana, Basile, and Patti 2018) in the context for each group and identifying the semantic axes (Lucy, Tadimeti, and Bamman 2022) that exhibit the most significant differences between the groups across decades. We support our method by showing that our proposed method can capture known socio political changes accurately and our findings indicate that while the relative number of African American names mentioned in books have increased over time, the context surrounding them remains more toxic than white Americans.

The taboo remains: Responding to a critical commentary

Suum Cuique: Studying Bias in Taboo Detection with a Community Perspective

A Novel Method for Analysing Racial Bias: Collection of Person Level References

Taboo and Collaborative Knowledge Production: Evidence from Wikipedia

Effects of context and individual differences on the processing of taboo words

Tempering an interpretation based on quality of data to make causal conclusions about race, inequities, and brain differences

Epistemic exclusion: A theory for understanding racism in faculty research evaluations.

Who Approves of Gossip, Ostracism, and Confrontation Following Norm Violations? A Cross-Cultural Test of Gender Stereotypes

Confronting scientific racism in psychology: Lessons from evolutionary biology and genetics.

Selective suppression of taboo information in visual word recognition: Evidence for cognitive control on semantics.

A Note on the Use of Race and Color in Jewish Social Scientific Research

All Claims in the Original Article Hold As Stated

An Unintentional, Robust, and Replicable Pro-Black Bias in Social Judgment

Objectivity interrogation of racial scholarship in psychology and management

Taboo language across the globe: A multi-lab study

Observers of social media discussions about racial discrimination condemn denial but also adopt it

Life Histories of Taboo Knowledge Artifacts

When Societal Norms and Social Identity Collide

Changes and stagnation in contemporary racial stereotypes

Taboo: working memory and mental control in an interactive task

Reply to Jacquet Et Al.: Culture and the Neurobiology of Norm Violation Detection