Abstract:Semantic cognition, as described by the controlled semantic cognition (CSC) framework (Rogers et al., , Neuropsychologia, 76, 220), involves two key components: activation of coherent, generalizable concepts within a heteromodal 'hub' in combination with modality-specific features (spokes), and a constraining mechanism that manipulates and gates this knowledge to generate time- and task-appropriate behaviour. Executive-semantic goal representations, largely supported by executive regions such as frontal and parietal cortex, are thought to allow the generation of non-dominant aspects of knowledge when these are appropriate for the task or context. Semantic aphasia (SA) patients have executive-semantic deficits, and these are correlated with general executive impairment. If the CSC proposal is correct, patients with executive impairment should not only exhibit impaired semantic cognition, but should also show characteristics that align with those observed in SA. This possibility remains largely untested, as patients selected on the basis that they show executive impairment (i.e., with 'dysexecutive syndrome') have not been extensively tested on tasks tapping semantic control and have not been previously compared with SA cases. We explored conceptual processing in 12 patients showing symptoms consistent with dysexecutive syndrome (DYS) and 24 SA patients, using a range of multimodal semantic assessments which manipulated control demands. Patients with executive impairments, despite not being selected to show semantic impairments, nevertheless showed parallel patterns to SA cases. They showed strong effects of distractor strength, cues and miscues, and probe-target distance, plus minimal effects of word frequency on comprehension (unlike semantic dementia patients with degradation of conceptual knowledge). This supports a component process account of semantic cognition in which retrieval is shaped by control processes, and confirms that deficits in SA patients reflect difficulty controlling semantic retrieval.

Selective suppression of taboo information in visual word recognition: Evidence for cognitive control on semantics.

Word meanings survive visual crowding: evidence from ERPs

When does reading dirty words impede picture processing? Taboo interference with verbal and manual responses

Fast habituation to semantic interference generated by taboo connotation in reading aloud

Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks

Opposite ERP Effects for Conscious and Unconscious Semantic Processing under Continuous Flash Suppression

Electrophysiological signature of suppression of competitors during interference resolution

Effects of context and individual differences on the processing of taboo words

EEG Based Decoding of the Perception and Regulation of Taboo Words

Taboo words: the effect of emotion on memory for peripheral information

Social acquisition context matters: Increased neural responses for native but not nonnative taboo words

Taboo: working memory and mental control in an interactive task

Neuromodulation of cursing in American English: A combined tDCS and pupillometry study

Semantic Stroop interference is modulated by the availability of executive resources: Insights from delta-plot analyses and cognitive load manipulation

Word Wins Over Face: Emotional Stroop Effect Activates the Frontal Cortical Network

Observing the suppression of individual aversive memories from conscious awareness

On ignoring words—exploring the neural signature of inhibition of affective words using ERPs

Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words

The contribution of executive control to semantic cognition: Convergent evidence from semantic aphasia and executive dysfunction

Stimulus Feature Conflicts Enhance Motor Inhibitory Control Processes in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex

Memory modulation: Dominance of negative visual context over neutral verbal memory