Abstract:Humans have the ability to intentionally forget information via different strategies, included suppression of encoding (directed forgetting) and mental replacement of the item to encode (thought substitution). These strategies may rely on different neural mechanisms; namely, encoding suppression may induce prefrontally mediated inhibition, whereas thought substitution is potentially accomplished through modulating contextual representations. Yet, few studies have directly related inhibitory processing to encoding suppression, or tested its involvement in thought substitution. Here, we directly tested whether encoding suppression recruits inhibitory mechanisms with a cross-task design, relating the behavioral and neural data from male and female participants in a Stop Signal task (a task specifically testing inhibitory processing) to a directed forgetting task with both encoding suppression (Forget) and thought substitution (Imagine) cues. Behaviorally, Stop Signal task performance (stop signal reaction times) was related to the magnitude of encoding suppression, but not thought substitution. Two complementary neural analyses corroborated the behavioral result. Namely, brain-behavior analysis demonstrated that the magnitude of right-frontal beta activity following stop signals was related to stop signal reaction times and successful encoding suppression, but not thought substitution; and classifiers trained to discriminate successful and unsuccessful stopping in the Stop Signal task could also classify successful and unsuccessful forgetting following Forget cues, but not Imagine cues. Importantly, inhibitory neural mechanisms were engaged following Forget cues at a later time than motor stopping. These findings not only support an inhibitory account of directed forgetting, and that thought substitution engages separate mechanisms, but also potentially identify a specific time in which inhibition occurs when suppressing encoding.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Forgetting often seems like an unintended experience, but forgetting can be intentional, and can be accomplished with multiple strategies. These strategies, including encoding suppression and thought substitution, may rely on different neural mechanisms. Here, we test the hypothesis that encoding suppression engages domain-general prefrontally driven inhibitory control mechanisms, while thought substitution does not. Using cross-task analyses, we provide evidence that encoding suppression engages the same inhibitory mechanisms used for stopping motor actions, but these mechanisms are not engaged by thought substitution. These findings not only support the notion that mnemonic encoding processes can be directly inhibited, but also have broad relevance, as certain populations with disrupted inhibitory processing may be more successful accomplishing intentional forgetting through thought substitution strategies.

Electrophysiological signature of suppression of competitors during interference resolution

Opposite ERP Effects for Conscious and Unconscious Semantic Processing under Continuous Flash Suppression

An electrophysiological signature for proactive interference resolution in working memory.

Electrophysiological Evidence That Release from Proactive Inhibition Reflects Late Semantic Processing.

Selective suppression of taboo information in visual word recognition: Evidence for cognitive control on semantics.

Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology

Reconsidering Unconscious Persistence: Suppressing Unwanted Memories Reduces Their Indirect Expression in Later Thoughts

Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering

A multiverse analysis of early attempts to replicate memory suppression with the Think/No-think Task

Inhibitory control is associated with the activation of output-driven competitors in a spoken word recognition task

Suppression of Aversive Memories Associates with Changes in Early and Late Stages of Neurocognitive Processing

Electrophysiological correlates of competitor activation predict retrieval-induced forgetting

Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks

Electrophysiological correlates of proactive interference in the ‘Recent Probes’ verbal working memory task

Differential Recruitment of Inhibitory Control Processes by Directed Forgetting and Thought Substitution

Neural mechanisms for secondary suppression of emotional distractors: Evidence from concurrent electroencephalography-magnetoencephalography data

Inhibition Resolves Simon Conflict: Evidence from EEG Decoding

On ignoring words—exploring the neural signature of inhibition of affective words using ERPs

Observing the suppression of individual aversive memories from conscious awareness

Human Recognition Memory and Conflict Control: an Event-Related Potential Study.

The role of visual association cortices during response selection processes in interference-modulated response stopping