Abstract:Introduction Inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) are the gold standard treatment for erectile dysfunction refractory to conservative therapies. However, infection remains a significant concern and the presence of microbial biofilms on both infected and non-infected devices has recently been demonstrated. Various antimicrobials are used for prophylaxis intraoperatively and postoperatively. It remains unknown how these antimicrobials affect the growth of bacteria and their associated biofilms. We sought to assess how commonly used antimicrobials influenced growth of bacterial isolates previously isolated from both non-infected and infected devices, obtained during revisional surgery. Objective The goal of this study was to evaluate growth of bacterial isolates previously obtained from non-infected and infected IPPs. Isolates were exposed to single or multi-antibiotic combinations to assess degree of inhibition of bacterial growth. Methods In this IRB-approved study, 35 bacterial isolates had been previously obtained from patients who had been consented for IPP revision or replacement secondary to mechanical failure, pain, or device infection. Bacteria were plated on brain-heart-infusion (BHI) agar plates and allowed to incubate for 48 hours. Standard-sized antibiotic discs were introduced into the grown bacterial colonies consisting of the following single or multi-agent regimens: bacitracin, cefaclor, cephazolin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tobramycin, vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, gentamicin + piperacillin/tazobactam, gentamicin + cephazolin, and gentamicin + vancomycin. Zones of inhibition (ZOI) were measured after placement of the antibiotic discs in the bacterial colonies. Statistics were analyzed with false discovery rate corrected, one-sample t-tests. Quantification of antibiotic resistance was defined as follows: Resistant: ZOI not significantly different from 0 in one sample t-test Susceptible: ZOI significantly greater than 0, but mean is 20mm Taxonomic classification of bacterial isolates was provided by extracting DNA from pure cultures and sequencing the full length 16S rRNA gene using Sanger sequencing, after amplification with two different primer sets to provide overlapping sequence regions. Results Of the antibiotics tested, TMP-SMX was found to have the highest percentage of resistant isolates (54.3%) of the 35 tested, with bacitracin having the second most (40%). Both tobramycin and TMP-SMX had 0.0% of isolates be exceptionally susceptible. Combination piperacillin/tazobactam was found to have the highest percentage of exceptionally susceptible isolates (11.4%). A large majority of isolates were highly susceptible to gentamicin + piperacillin/tazobactam (91.4%), piperacillin/tazobactam (74.3%), gentamicin + cefazolin (74.3%), and levofloxacin (88.6%), while greater than half of isolates were highly susceptible to cefazolin (62.9%) and cefaclor (54.3%)." Conclusions Our results demonstrate that cefaclor or bacitracin prevented growth of bacterial isolates obtained from IPPs explanted for mechanical failure, pain or infection. Further investigation is needed to characterize how intraoperative and postoperative antibiotic influences a symbiotic or dysbiotic community of microbes on the surface of penile prostheses. By better understanding the interactions between microbes, antibiotics and host, novel therapeutics might promote a non-infected, symbiotic microenvironment. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast corporation. Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, boston scientific.

Response to the Commentary on: Does time of intraoperative exposure to the aerobiome increase microbial growth on inflatable penile prostheses?

Comment on: Does time of intraoperative exposure to the aerobiome increase microbial growth on inflatable penile prostheses?

(044) Does Time of Intraoperative Exposure to the Aerobiome Increase Microbial Growth on Inflatable Penile Prostheses?

(128) Characterizing Antibiotic Susceptibility of the Penile Prosthesis Microbiome

Response to Letter to the Editor on "Antibiotic dip and irrigation solutions confer increased antimicrobial efficacy of inflatable penile prosthesis hydrophilic surfaces compared with 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate"

Comment on Risk factors for reoperation of inflatable penile prosthesis among an ethnically diverse urban population in a high-volume center

(132) Comparing the Frequencies of Different Species Present in Revision Penile Prostheses Surgery due to Infectious or Non-Infectious Causes

Mitigating infections in implantable urological continence devices: risks, challenges, solutions, and future innovations. A comprehensive literature review

A Comprehensive Review of Fungal Infections in Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery

Letter to Editor on "Antibiotic dip and irrigation solutions confer increased antimicrobial efficacy of inflatable penile prosthesis hydrophilic surfaces compared with 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate"

(046) An Approach to the Thoughtful Selection of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery

The Impact of Antimicrobial Therapy Duration in the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infections Depending on Surgical Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Indwelling urological device biofilm composition and characteristics in the presence and absence of infection

(374) Comparing the Species Richness in Infectious versus Mechanical Failure Cases in Secondary Penile Prostheses Surgeries

Perioperative infection prevention during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review

(179) Does Climate Impact IPP Infection Risk? Assessment of Temperature and Dew Point on IPP Infections

(045) Comparing Bacterial Presence with the Usage of 0.05% Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Lavage During Urologic Prosthesis Revision Surgery: Update on Results

Does climate impact inflatable penile prosthesis infection (IPP) risk? Assessment of temperature and dew point on IPP infections

(020) Does Climate Impact IPP Infection Risk? Assessment of Temperature and Dew Point on IPP Infections

Proposal and clinical validation of a perioperative algorithm enhancing antimicrobial stewardship in substitution urethroplasty

Addressing the need for preclinical study of penile prosthesis infection: a new animal model and narrative review