Abstract:[Purpose] This study examines the impact of executives’ financial expertise on the funding level of defined benefit pension plans. On one hand, if executives with high financial expertise prefer to utilize available cash for more efficient investment options rather than locking it up in pension contributions, a negative relationship is expected. On the other hand, if executives with high financial expertise aim to increase the current funding level to alleviate future cash constraints or are concerned about negative evaluations in the capital market, a positive relationship is expected. The empirical analysis seeks to determine whether executives’ financial expertise lowers or raises the pension funding level. [Methodology] The sample for analysis consists of companies listed on the KOSPI and KOSDAQ from 2012 to 2022 that have adopted a defined benefit pension plan. Although the pension system was implemented in 2005, the initial period is excluded due to the low adoption rate of pension plans and the low funding ratio of defined benefit assets at the beginning of the system’s implementation. Executives’ financial expertise is measured by executives with keywords in their past careers such as finance, accounting, treasury, or CFO, and the pension funding level is measured by the ratio of pension assets to pension liabilities. [Findings] The empirical analysis shows that the higher the proportion of executives with financial expertise, the lower the pension funding level. This result can be interpreted as companies with executives having high financial expertise maintaining a lower funding level due to the high opportunity cost of investing available cash in pension contributions. Additionally, we find that the negative relationship between executives’ financial expertise and the pension funding level is driven by the subsample with a high funding level. [Implications] The results of this study provide evidence that for the pension system to act as a means of securing workers’ retirement income, an improvement in the return on pension assets is necessary.

Why are pension schemes frozen, and how does a freeze affect the Employer's risk?

Does Freezing a Defined-Benefit Pension Plan Increase Company Value? Empirical Evidence

Text Mining for U.S. Pension De-Risking Analysis

De-risking strategies of defined benefit plans and economic outcome: empirical evidence from U.S. Firms

Does social responsibility begin at home? The relation between firms’ pension policies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities

The disappearing defined benefit pension and its potential impact on the retirement incomes of baby boomers

Are Companies Offloading Risk onto Employees in Times of Uncertainty? Insights from Corporate Pension Plans

Risk and Portfolio Choices in Individual and Collective Pension Plans

Corporate Social Responsibility, Pension Assumptions, and Risky Asset Allocations in Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Financial Risks and the Pension Protection Fund: Can it Survive Them?

Optimal defined-contribution pension management with financial and mortality risks

Financial Expertise of Corporate Executives and Pension Funding Level

Re-assessing the role of financial professionals in pension fund investment strategies

PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS, PENSION AWARENESS, AND CHANGING PERSONAL FINANCES

Health Cost Risk, Informal Insurance, and Annuitization Decisions

Do Financing Constraints Lead to Incremental Tax Planning? Evidence from the Pension Protection Act of 2006

Financing Constraints and the Cost of Capital: Evidence from the Funding of Corporate Pension Plans

DC Pension Fund Best-practice Design and Governance

Pension accounting information and firm value: An analysis of FTSE 100 companies

Defined Contribution Pension Risk and Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from United Kingdom

Intergenerational cross-subsidies in UK collective defined contribution (CDC) funds