George W. Stocking, ed. Functionalism Historicized. Essays on British Social Anthropology . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984. Pp. vi + 244. ISBN 0-299-09900-8. No price given.

P. Bowler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400022846
1986-03-01
Abstract:untutored in principle, was the enemy of both 'pure' and 'applied' science. Whether Edward Bulwer-Lytton's Mr Bluff, a 'sensible, practical man' was ever a charater in chemistry, we do not know, but he was widely believed to exist. And his fomulaic 'look to the facts' was, of course, not necessarily opposed to experiment. In chemistry the distinction between applied science, research for development and practice, is, in any event, difficult to make; and if the Chemical Society preferred to cultivate one end of the field, the Society of Chemical Industry could till the other. If these categories are analytically important (and there is a long history of argument from Pasteur to Rothschild to say that they are not), it is important to articulate them clearly. This, Bud and Roberts do not always succeed in doing.
Chemistry,History,Sociology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?