Abstract:WE recorded last week (p. 69) the formation of a National Institute of Economic and Social Research, one of the functions of which will be scientific inquiry into the facts and problems of contemporary human society. The committee which has had this development under discussion since last March includes leading representatives of various aspects of economics ; but we miss the names of scientific workers in the wider field of social biology, or with intimate knowledge of the forces which are chiefly responsible for the problems involved in the changed and changing social structure of all civilized peoples. Two statements on the interactionbetween science and society may be used to illustrate what we have in mind. One is an address given by Prof. H. Levy on December 13 at a meetingcalled by the Manchester Scientists Peace Association. He pointed out that men of science and their pursuits are a part of society and that the results of their work do not affect society more certainly than the nature of society itself determines the nature and extent of their own investigations. Prof. Levy's address was in the main concerned with the scientific and objective study of problems of peace, and he urged the claims of the scientific man to a greater share in administrative responsibility. His argument is, however, essentially similar to that of Prof. J. Marrack in his thought-provoking essay on the soeial implications of biochemistry, contributed to the volume of essays "Perspectives in Biochemistry" which was presented to Sir Frederick Gowland Hopkins by past and present members of his laboratory on his seventy-fifth birthday. Prof. Marrack points out that the future trend of biochemical investigation in problems of nutrition depends largely on what form society takes. It is onlyas a result of the biochemical work of the last thirty years, the discovery of vitamins and the later investigations of mineral and protein requirements that it has become possible to draw up diet standards. From this fundamental knowledge, the conclusion is reached that the health of a large proportion of the people of Great Britain would be improved by a better diet and that the adequacy of a family's diet depends on the family income.

The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other

What Are the Social Studies of Science?

The Role of Social Science in Engineering

Constructing dystopian experience: A Neurath-Cartwrightian approach to the philosophy of social technology

The Social Constructivism and the Paradigmatic Shift in Studies of Philosophy of Technology

Constructivism as a Theoretical Foundation for the Use of Technology in Social Studies

Science Studies and Sociology

The Common Denominator: The Reception and Impact of Berger and Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality

The Social Construction of Reality (1966) Revisited: Epistemology and Theorizing in the Study of Religion

From "historicism" to "Constructivism"

Integrating Discourse, Construction and Objectivity: A Contemporary Realist Approach

The Sociological Turn in Translation Studies and Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociology: A Case of Convergence or Divergence?

Engineering Collaborative Social Science Toolkits. STS Methods and Concepts as Devices for Interdisciplinary Diplomacy

Science and Social Problems

'Civil skepticism' and the social construction of knowledge: A case in dendroclimatology

Innovation of Information Science Theory:The Uniform View of Social Constructionism and Extended Cognition

Evolution of SSK in the View of Realism

Conceptualization of the Social within Sociological Knowledge:Doxa and Bourdieu's sociological knowledge theory

Philosophy of Science Tend to Social Constructivism

"Social science is explanation or it is nothing." Introduction to a debate

The Sciences Are Discursive Constructs: the Communication Perspective As an Empirical Philosophy of Science