Abstract:Abstract This paper identifies a significant gap in existing work within the field of educational technology—the failure to explain technology theoretically—and proposes an agenda for addressing this. While there are discussions of theory within educational technology research, these typically focus on learning. Technology itself is seldom considered, being treated instead as “natural” or given. This is in marked contrast to other fields of study, in which robust theories of technology have been developed. The consequence of this is that technology is treated as if it will cause learning—and when it does not, there is no clear explanation of why. To advance this discussion, two traditions of work theorising technology are introduced—one positivistic, including work on affordance, and the other (largely unrepresented in educational technology) that provides a social account. An example of each is used to analyse a case study, so as to contrast the kind of claims that currently get made about technology with those that we could make. It is argued that adopting a social account of technology would enable richer, better‐integrated claims to be made about technology use. Practitioner Notes What is already known about this topic Technology is a central concern of research in the field, but it is not clear how we should think about this term. While work in the field some decades ago tried to conceptualise technology, it is now treated as a taken‐for‐granted category. What this paper adds Systematic evidence is provided that we rely on a “common sense” understanding of technology. The idea of technology is explicitly debated in other fields of study, and two of those traditions are reviewed here. An example is provided that illustrates that these other conceptions of technology can provide richer accounts of empirical work than those currently dominant in the field. Implications for practice and/or policy We cannot assume that technology will simply have “effects” on people. Alternative accounts of technology provide richer explanations of technology use, and would benefit the field.

Constructivism as a Theoretical Foundation for the Use of Technology in Social Studies

Student-centered Education and Constructivism: Challenges, Concerns, and Clarity for Teachers

Social Constructivism: A New Paradigm in Teaching and Learning Environment

The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other

The Evolution of Social Constructivism in Political Science: Past to Present

Constructivist Approach to Learning: An Analysis of Pedagogical Models of Social Constructivist Learning Theory

CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORY AS A FOUNDATION FOR THE UTILIZATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN THE LIFELONG LEARNING PROCESS

Promoting understanding in digital contexts: using the construction-integration model as a framework for educational technology design and assessment

Social Constructionism: A Postmodern Lens on the Dynamics of Social Learning

Science Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century: a Pedagogical Framework for Technology-Integrated Social Constructivism

Social Constructivism—Jerome Bruner

Constructivist learning theory and human capital theory: shifting political and educational frameworks for teachers' ICT professional development

What in the world is educational technology? Rethinking the field from the perspective of the philosophy of technology

Learning technology: Theorising the tools we study

Applying constructivism in instructivist learning cultures

Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promise

Teaching to Tech: A Quasi-Experimental Assessment of a Technology-Enhanced Social Work Course

Learning and Collective Knowledge Construction With Social Media: A Process-Oriented Perspective

Ethics Inside the Black Box: Integrating Science and Technology Studies into Engineering and Public Policy Curricula

Constructivist pedagogy in context of modern philosophy of education

What is wrong with constructivist teaching? Elaboration, recapitulation and synthesis of theoretical and historical controversies