Abstract:BACKGROUND:Self-report pain assessment scales may be inappropriate when critically ill patients are incapable of adequate communication because of sedation or mechanical ventilation. The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS, for intubated patients) and the BPS-non intubated (BPS-NI, for non-intubated patients) measure objective behavioral indicators of pain in non-communicating critically ill patients. OBJECTIVES:To develop a Chinese version of the BPS combining the original version of the BPS and BPS-NI suitable for pain assessment among critically ill patients and to determine its reliability and validity. DESIGN:Two cross-sectional studies. SETTINGS:A 15-bed surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a teaching hospital in Beijing, China. PARTICIPANTS:In the first study, 129 patients (53 intubated and 76 non-intubated) were recruited; in the second study, 83 (43 intubated and 40 non-intubated) were recruited. METHODS:The Chinese version of the BPS (BPS-C) was developed via rigorous translation methods, including double back-translation and content validation involving 13 clinical experts. Internal consistency, discriminative validity, and criterion-related validity were established using the BPS-C and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The BPS-C and NRS were used to assess pain in 53 intubated and 76 non-intubated post-abdominal surgery patients during low pain exposure and increased pain exposure in the first study. To establish interrater reliability, a researcher and a bedside nurse independently performed 172 paired assessments in 43 intubated patients and 160 paired assessments in 40 non-intubated patients with the BPS-C under the same conditions in the second study. RESULTS:The BPS-C achieved conceptual and semantic equivalence with the original tool. Internal consistency was established through Cronbach's alpha (α=0.724-0.743 in intubated patients, α=0.701-0.762 in non-intubated patients). Interrater reliability was confirmed through the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), which ranged from 0.962 to 1.000 in both intubated and non-intubated patients with high agreement percentages (95.3-100.0% in intubated and 95.0-100.0% in non-intubated patients). BPS-C scores during increased exposure to pain were significantly higher than those obtained during low exposure to pain, indicating discriminative validity. Criterion-related validity was confirmed by strong positive correlations between BPS-C and NRS scores (Pearson's correlations r=0.815-0.937 for intubated patients, Pearson's correlations r=0.755-0.899 for non-intubated patients). CONCLUSIONS:The Chinese version of the BPS (BPS-C) is appropriate for pain assessment among intubated and non-intubated ICU patients.

Chinese Version of the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool: Critical Patient Reliability and Validity

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Validation of a Chinese Version Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in Nonintubated and Intubated Critically Ill Patients: Two Cross-Sectional Studies

The Chinese Version of Oxford Depression Questionnaire: A Validation Study in Patients with Mood Disorders

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Preoperative Assessment of Readiness Tool among Surgical Patients

Adaptation Of The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (Ceq) In China: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the behavioral pain scale in intubated and non-intubated critically ill patients: Two cross-sectional studies

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

Linguistic adaptation, validation and comparison of 3 routinely used neuropathic pain questionnaires

Construction of a Chinese Version of Combined Patients'Self-report Pain Assessment System for Children with Cancer

Cross-cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for Patients with Cancer Pain

Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study

Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Assess Pediatric Inpatients' Experience of Care in China.

Research progress of pain assessment tools for Intensive Care Unit patients

Chinese Translation of the Coma Recovery Scale—Revised

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire for Family Members of ICU Patients

Verification of the critical-care pain observation tool in conscious patients with hemiparesis or cognitive dysfunction

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the short-form of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-9) in patients with chronic pain: A single-center study

Translation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) for Patients with Chronic Pain in Mainland China

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the intensive care oral care frequency and assessment scale

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Empathy for Pain Scale in medical students