Exploration of a Multi-Parameter Technology for Pain Assessment in Postoperative Patients After Cardiac Surgery in the Intensive Care Unit: The Nociception Level Index (NOL)TM
Céline Gélinas,Shiva Shahiri T,Melissa Richard-Lalonde,Denny Laporta,Jean-François Morin,Madalina Boitor,Catherine E Ferland,Patricia Bourgault,Philippe Richebé
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S332845
IF: 2.8319
2021-12-07
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Céline Gélinas, 1, 2 Shiva Shahiri T, 1, 2 Melissa Richard-Lalonde, 1, 2 Denny Laporta, 3, 4 Jean-François Morin, 5, 6 Madalina Boitor, 7 Catherine E Ferland, 8, 9 Patricia Bourgault, 10 Philippe Richebé 11 1 Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 2 Centre for Nursing Research and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital – CIUSSS West-Central Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; 3 Faculty of Medicine, Respiratory Division, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 4 Department of Medicine, Division of Adult Critical Care, Jewish General Hospital – CIUSSS West-Central Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; 5 Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 6 Department of Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Jewish General Hospital – CIUSSS West-Central Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; 7 Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 8 Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 9 Shriners Hospitals for Children – Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada; 10 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; 11 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital – CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal – Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada Correspondence: Céline Gélinas Ingram School of Nursing – McGill University, 680, Sherbrooke West, Suite 1800, Montreal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada Tel +1 514 398 6157 Fax +1 514 398 8455 Email Introduction: The aim of this study was to explore the use of a multi-parameter technology, the Nociception Level (NOL) index (Medasense Biometrics Ltd, Ramat Gan, Israel), for pain assessment in postoperative awake patients after cardiac surgery during non-nociceptive and nociceptive procedures in the intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort repeated-measures design was used. Patients were included if they were in the ICU after undergoing cardiac surgery and if they could self-report their pain. A non-invasive probe was placed on the patient's finger for the continuous monitoring of the NOL index. Patients' self-reports of pain and anxiety (0– 10 Numeric Rating Scale or NRS), and behavioral scores with the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) were obtained before and during a non-nociceptive procedure (ie, non-invasive blood pressure [NIBP] using cuff inflation), and before, during and after a nociceptive procedure (ie, chest tube removal [CTR]) for a total of five time points. Non-parametric tests were used to compare scores at different time points, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. Results: Fifty-four patients were included in the analysis. The NOL index, pain and anxiety scores were significantly higher during CTR compared to rest and NIBP (p < 0.001). During CTR, the NOL was associated with self-reported pain intensity and unpleasantness but not with anxiety and CPOT scores. The NOL showed a modest performance in detecting pain (NRS ≥ 1 and ≥ 5) in this sample with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 61% to 85%. Conclusion: The NOL index was able to discriminate between a non-nociceptive and a nociceptive procedure and was associated with self-reported pain. Further validation testing of the NOL is necessary in a heterogeneous sample of ICU patients. Keywords: nociception, pain, pain assessment, adult, cardiac surgery, intensive care unit Assessing pain in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a challenging endeavor for clinicians striving to provide the best care for their patients. The patient's self-report should be obtained whenever possible as it represents the gold standard measure of pain. 1 However, a significant proportion of ICU patients are unable to communicate due to their critical condition and related treatment. In such situations, behavioral scales such as the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) 2 are recommended alternative measures, but their use have limitations. 3,4 Indeed, behaviors are impossible to monitor in paralyzed patients receiving neuromuscular blocking agents and they may be blurred with deep sedation. 5 Therefore, it is necessary to explore other pain or nociception assessment methods. 3–5 Physiological parameters such as vital signs (eg, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate) and number of skin conductance fluctuations (NSCF) have been found to inc -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology