Abstract:BACKGROUND:Self-report pain assessment scales may be inappropriate when critically ill patients are incapable of adequate communication because of sedation or mechanical ventilation. The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS, for intubated patients) and the BPS-non intubated (BPS-NI, for non-intubated patients) measure objective behavioral indicators of pain in non-communicating critically ill patients. OBJECTIVES:To develop a Chinese version of the BPS combining the original version of the BPS and BPS-NI suitable for pain assessment among critically ill patients and to determine its reliability and validity. DESIGN:Two cross-sectional studies. SETTINGS:A 15-bed surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a teaching hospital in Beijing, China. PARTICIPANTS:In the first study, 129 patients (53 intubated and 76 non-intubated) were recruited; in the second study, 83 (43 intubated and 40 non-intubated) were recruited. METHODS:The Chinese version of the BPS (BPS-C) was developed via rigorous translation methods, including double back-translation and content validation involving 13 clinical experts. Internal consistency, discriminative validity, and criterion-related validity were established using the BPS-C and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The BPS-C and NRS were used to assess pain in 53 intubated and 76 non-intubated post-abdominal surgery patients during low pain exposure and increased pain exposure in the first study. To establish interrater reliability, a researcher and a bedside nurse independently performed 172 paired assessments in 43 intubated patients and 160 paired assessments in 40 non-intubated patients with the BPS-C under the same conditions in the second study. RESULTS:The BPS-C achieved conceptual and semantic equivalence with the original tool. Internal consistency was established through Cronbach's alpha (α=0.724-0.743 in intubated patients, α=0.701-0.762 in non-intubated patients). Interrater reliability was confirmed through the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), which ranged from 0.962 to 1.000 in both intubated and non-intubated patients with high agreement percentages (95.3-100.0% in intubated and 95.0-100.0% in non-intubated patients). BPS-C scores during increased exposure to pain were significantly higher than those obtained during low exposure to pain, indicating discriminative validity. Criterion-related validity was confirmed by strong positive correlations between BPS-C and NRS scores (Pearson's correlations r=0.815-0.937 for intubated patients, Pearson's correlations r=0.755-0.899 for non-intubated patients). CONCLUSIONS:The Chinese version of the BPS (BPS-C) is appropriate for pain assessment among intubated and non-intubated ICU patients.

The cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) into the Indonesian version

Validation of a Chinese Version Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in Nonintubated and Intubated Critically Ill Patients: Two Cross-Sectional Studies

Nurses' evaluation of critical care pain observation tool (CPOT) implementation for mechanically ventilated intensive care patients

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) in ICU Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study

Verification of the critical-care pain observation tool in conscious patients with hemiparesis or cognitive dysfunction

Preliminary Clinical Testing to Inform Development of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam)

Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) in pediatric patients undergoing orthopedic surgery

Accuracy of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in critically ill conscious and unconscious patients: prospective, observational study

Improving Pain Management in the Intensive Care Unit by Assessment

Patient assessment of constipation quality of life questionnaire: validity and reliability for Indonesian population

Chinese Version of the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool: Critical Patient Reliability and Validity

Validity and Reliability of the Patient Assessment of Constipation: Symptoms (PAC-SYM ©) in the Indonesian Language

The Persian version of the fear of pain questionnaire mong Iranian post-surgery patients: a translation and psychometrics

Psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the nursing home survey on patient safety culture

Translation and Validation of the Thai Version of a Modified Brief Pain Inventory: A Concise Instrument for Pain Assessment in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery

Translation and validation of the Malay version of modified orthotics and prosthetics users' survey

Healthcare Professionals' Experiences in Providing Palliative Care in an Intensive Care Unit in Indonesia: A Phenomenological Study

Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Malay Advance Care Planning Questionnaire

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the behavioral pain scale in intubated and non-intubated critically ill patients: Two cross-sectional studies

Translation and Psychometric Analysis of the Indonesian Versions of the Lysholm and Tegner Scores for Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries