Abstract:Direct reciprocity is a mechanism for the evolution of cooperation. For the iterated prisoner’s dilemma, a new class of strategies has recently been described, the so-called zero-determinant strategies. Using such a strategy, a player can unilaterally enforce a linear relationship between his own payoff and the co-player’s payoff. In particular the player may act in such a way that it becomes optimal for the co-player to cooperate unconditionally. In this way, a player can manipulate and extort his co-player, thereby ensuring that the own payoff never falls below the co-player’s payoff. However, using a compliant strategy instead, a player can also ensure that his own payoff never exceeds the co-player’s payoff. Here, we use adaptive dynamics to study when evolution leads to extortion and when it leads to compliance. We find a remarkable cyclic dynamics: in sufficiently large populations, extortioners play a transient role, helping the population to move from selfish strategies to compliance. Compliant strategies, however, can be subverted by altruists, which in turn give rise to selfish strategies. Whether cooperative strategies are favored in the long run critically depends on the size of the population; we show that cooperation is most abundant in large populations, in which case average payoffs approach the social optimum. Our results are not restricted to the case of the prisoners dilemma, but can be extended to other social dilemmas, such as the snowdrift game. Iterated social dilemmas in large populations do not lead to the evolution of strategies that aim to dominate their co-player. Instead, generosity succeeds.

Direct reciprocity in structured populations

Direct reciprocity on graphs

Repeated games and direct reciprocity under active linking

Evolution of direct reciprocity in group-structured populations

Partners and rivals in direct reciprocity

A unified framework of direct and indirect reciprocity

Direct Reciprocity in Spatial Populations Enhances R-Reciprocity As Well As ST-Reciprocity

The co-evolution of direct, indirect and generalized reciprocity

Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in neutral populations

Evolutionary dynamics in repeated optional games

Adaptive dynamics of extortion and compliance

Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations

Chaos and the evolution of cooperation.

Comparing reactive and memory-one strategies of direct reciprocity

Correlation of Positive and Negative Reciprocity Fails to Confer an Evolutionary Advantage: Phase Transitions to Elementary Strategies

Evolutionary Dynamics of Direct and Indirect Reciprocities with Directional Interactions

Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of direct reciprocity

Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem

Defection and extortion as unexpected catalysts of unconditional cooperation in structured populations

Reciprocal cooperation can be stable when the presence of defectors selects for discrimination

Heterogeneous indirect reciprocity promotes the evolution of cooperation in structured populations