Abstract:Many recent studies on evolutionary spatial Prisoner's Dilemma (SPD) games have provided insights into the mechanisms and frameworks that bolster the effect of network reciprocity. In this article, we provide a concise and comprehensive review of previous studies on evolutionary games and network reciprocity. Subsequently, we evaluate and compare the results from such studies in a unified manner to answer an open question in evolutionary SPD games: What are the factors underlying network reciprocity and what effect do these factors have on the emergence and promotion of cooperation? As a first step, we introduce a novel indicator to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness (contribution) of a final fraction of cooperators via the introduction of the associated mechanisms into a simple evolutionary SPD game. In this game, the players are located on a two-dimensional square lattice with the Moore neighborhood and update their strategies by imitating the strategy of the best performing player among their neighbors, and the dynamics are separated into two periods: the enduring (END) period and the expanding (EXP) period. The initial fraction of cooperators is decreased transiently via the invasion and exploitation of defectors in the END period, and over the period, the fraction of cooperators is increased to expand cooperative clusters in the EXP period. Moreover, we also evaluate the statistical validity of our indicator by performing regression analyses. Our results indicate that two factors bolster the effect of network reciprocity: (1) the shape of the cooperative cluster (C-cluster) formed in the END period and (2) the ability to expand a single perfect C-cluster, which is the smallest patch, to increase the opportunity for interactions between cooperators and defectors and reduce exploitation by defectors in the EXP period.

Direct Reciprocity in Spatial Populations Enhances R-Reciprocity As Well As ST-Reciprocity

Spatial reciprocity for discrete, continuous and mixed strategy setups

Insight into the So-Called Spatial Reciprocity.

Cooperation Enhanced by Indirect Reciprocity in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Games for Social P2P Systems

Spatial reciprocity in the evolution of cooperation.

Effects of Reciprocal Rewarding on the Evolution of Cooperation in Voluntary Social Dilemmas

Evolution of direct reciprocity in group-structured populations

Reciprocal-reward-based environmental feedback promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game

Dynamical reciprocity in interacting games: Numerical results and mechanism analysis

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Multigame with Voluntary Participation

Influence of Bolstering Network Reciprocity in the Evolutionary Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game: a Perspective

Multi-games on Interdependent Networks and the Evolution of Cooperation

Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation

Repeated Thinking Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Moderate Intra-Group Bias Maximizes Cooperation on Interdependent Populations.

Interaction Stochasticity Supports Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma.

Heterogeneous indirect reciprocity promotes the evolution of cooperation in structured populations

The evolution of cooperation and diversity by integrated indirect reciprocity

Reciprocal Altruism-based Cooperation in a Social Network Game

Diffusion Sustains Cooperation Via Forming Diverse Spatial Patterns in Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Comparing reactive and memory-one strategies of direct reciprocity