Abstract:Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of six upgraded empirical force fields were compared and evaluated with short peptides, intrinsically disordered proteins, and folded proteins using trajectories of 1, 1.5, 5, or 10 μs (five replicates of 200 ns, 300 ns, 1 μs, or 2 μs) for each system. Previous studies have shown that different force fields, water models, simulation methods, and parameters can affect simulation outcomes. Here, the MD simulations were done in an explicit solvent with RS-peptide, HEWL19, HIV-rev, β amyloid (Aβ)-40, Aβ-42, phosphodiesterase-γ, CspTm, and ubiquitin using ff99IDPs, ff14IDPs, ff14IDPSFF, ff03w, CHARMM36m, and CHARMM22* force fields. The IDP ensembles generated by six all-atom empirical force fields were compared against NMR data. Despite using identical starting structures and simulation parameters, ensembles obtained with different force fields exhibit significant differences in NMR RMDs, secondary structure contents, and global properties such as the radius of gyration. The intrinsically disordered protein (IDP)-specific force fields could substantially reproduce the experimental observables in force field comparison: they have the lowest error in chemical shifts and J-couplings for short peptides/proteins, reasonably well for large IDPs and reasonably well with the radius of gyration. A high population of disorderness was observed in the IDP-specific force field for the IDP ensemble with a fraction of β sheets for β-amyloids. CHARMM22* performs better for many observables; however, it still has a preference toward the helicity for short peptides. The results of β-amyloid 42 starting from two different initial structures (Aβ421Z0Q and Aβ42model) were also compared with DSSP and NMR data. The results obtained with IDP-specific force fields within 2 μs simulation time are similar, even though starting from different structures. The current force fields perform equally well for folded proteins. The results of currently developed or modified force fields for IDPs are capable of enlightening the overall performance of the force field for disordered as well as folded proteins, thereby contributing to force field development.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762</a>.Predicted measurement comparison (Table S1); secondary chemical shift conversion (Figure S1); time evolution of the cumulative Rg and the end-to-end distance (Figure S2); comparison of secondary chemical shifts between MD simulations and NMR experiments (Figure S3); cluster analyses (Figure S4); calculated NMR observables in simulations of Ab40 starting from the PDB structure and the extended structure (Figure S5); secondary structure propensity analysis of the trajectories (Figure S6); RMSD analyses of all of the trajectories under the tested force fields (Figure S7) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762/suppl_file/ci0c00762_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Assessing the Performance of Peptide Force Fields for Modeling the Solution Structural Ensembles of Cyclic Peptides

Training Neural Network Models Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation Results to Efficiently Predict Cyclic Hexapeptide Structural Ensembles

A Test of AMBER Force Fields in Predicting the Secondary Structure of Α-Helical and Β-Hairpin Peptides

Accelerated Molecular Dynamics for Peptide Folding: Benchmarking Different Combinations of Force Fields and Explicit Solvent Models

Elucidating Solution Structures of Cyclic Peptides Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Accurate Structure Prediction and Conformational Analysis of Cyclic Peptides with Residue-Specific Force Fields.

Computational Methods for Studying Conformational Behaviors of Cyclic Peptides.

Systematic Validation of Protein Force Fields against Experimental Data

Accurate Structure Prediction for Cyclic Peptides Containing Proline Residues with High-Temperature Molecular Dynamics

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Transmembrane Cyclic Peptide Nanotubes Using Classical Force Fields, Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning, and Hydrogen Isotope Exchange Methods: A Critical Comparison

Pace Force Field for Protein Simulations. 2. Folding Simulations of Peptides

A Force Balanced Fragmentation Method for Ab Initio Molecular Dynamic Simulation of Protein

Modeling of Peptides Containing D-amino Acids: Implications on Cyclization

Developments and Applications of Coil-Library-Based Residue-Specific Force Fields for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Peptides and Proteins

Applications of Molecular Dynamics Simulation in Structure Prediction of Peptides and Proteins

Validating Small-Molecule Force Fields for Macrocyclic Compounds Using NMR Data in Different Solvents

Development of a Hybrid-Resolution Force Field for Peptide Self-Assembly Simulations: Optimizing Peptide-Peptide and Peptide-Solvent Interactions

Coupled Two-Dimensional Main-Chain Torsional Potential for Protein Dynamics II: Performance and Validation.

Quality of force fields and sampling methods in simulating pepX peptides: a case study for intrinsically disordered proteins

An Evaluation of Force Field Accuracy for the Mini-Protein Chignolin using Markov State Models

Comparison and Evaluation of Force Fields for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins