Abstract:Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of six upgraded empirical force fields were compared and evaluated with short peptides, intrinsically disordered proteins, and folded proteins using trajectories of 1, 1.5, 5, or 10 μs (five replicates of 200 ns, 300 ns, 1 μs, or 2 μs) for each system. Previous studies have shown that different force fields, water models, simulation methods, and parameters can affect simulation outcomes. Here, the MD simulations were done in an explicit solvent with RS-peptide, HEWL19, HIV-rev, β amyloid (Aβ)-40, Aβ-42, phosphodiesterase-γ, CspTm, and ubiquitin using ff99IDPs, ff14IDPs, ff14IDPSFF, ff03w, CHARMM36m, and CHARMM22* force fields. The IDP ensembles generated by six all-atom empirical force fields were compared against NMR data. Despite using identical starting structures and simulation parameters, ensembles obtained with different force fields exhibit significant differences in NMR RMDs, secondary structure contents, and global properties such as the radius of gyration. The intrinsically disordered protein (IDP)-specific force fields could substantially reproduce the experimental observables in force field comparison: they have the lowest error in chemical shifts and J-couplings for short peptides/proteins, reasonably well for large IDPs and reasonably well with the radius of gyration. A high population of disorderness was observed in the IDP-specific force field for the IDP ensemble with a fraction of β sheets for β-amyloids. CHARMM22* performs better for many observables; however, it still has a preference toward the helicity for short peptides. The results of β-amyloid 42 starting from two different initial structures (Aβ421Z0Q and Aβ42model) were also compared with DSSP and NMR data. The results obtained with IDP-specific force fields within 2 μs simulation time are similar, even though starting from different structures. The current force fields perform equally well for folded proteins. The results of currently developed or modified force fields for IDPs are capable of enlightening the overall performance of the force field for disordered as well as folded proteins, thereby contributing to force field development.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762</a>.Predicted measurement comparison (Table S1); secondary chemical shift conversion (Figure S1); time evolution of the cumulative Rg and the end-to-end distance (Figure S2); comparison of secondary chemical shifts between MD simulations and NMR experiments (Figure S3); cluster analyses (Figure S4); calculated NMR observables in simulations of Ab40 starting from the PDB structure and the extended structure (Figure S5); secondary structure propensity analysis of the trajectories (Figure S6); RMSD analyses of all of the trajectories under the tested force fields (Figure S7) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762/suppl_file/ci0c00762_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Accelerated Molecular Dynamics for Peptide Folding: Benchmarking Different Combinations of Force Fields and Explicit Solvent Models

A Test of AMBER Force Fields in Predicting the Secondary Structure of Α-Helical and Β-Hairpin Peptides

Assessing the Performance of Peptide Force Fields for Modeling the Solution Structural Ensembles of Cyclic Peptides

Comparison and Evaluation of Force Fields for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Helical Proteins Folding in Explicit Water

A Force Balanced Fragmentation Method for Ab Initio Molecular Dynamic Simulation of Protein

Dissipative Particle Dynamics Simulation of Protein Folding in Explicit and Implicit Solvents: Coarse-Grained Model for Atomic Resolution

A Test of Implicit Solvent Models on the Folding Simulation of the GB1 Peptide.

Evaluating force field accuracy with long-time simulations of a tryptophan zipper peptide

Correct Folding of an Α-Helix and a Β-Hairpin Using a Polarized 2D Torsional Potential

Folding Simulations for Proteins with Diverse Topologies Are Accessible in Days with A Physics-Based Force Field and Implicit Solvent

Residue-Speci fi c Force Field Based on the Protein Coil Library

Evaluating the Dynamics and Electrostatic Interactions of Folded Proteins in Implicit Solvents

Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters

Development of a Hybrid-Resolution Force Field for Peptide Self-Assembly Simulations: Optimizing Peptide-Peptide and Peptide-Solvent Interactions

An Evaluation of Force Field Accuracy for the Mini-Protein Chignolin using Markov State Models

Systematic Validation of Protein Force Fields against Experimental Data

Intrinsic Conformational Dynamics of Glycine and Alanine in Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Force Fields: Comparison to Spectroscopic Data

Examination of the Quality of Various Force Fields and Solvation Models for the Equilibrium Simulations of GA88 and GB88

Extensive Conformational Searches of 13 Representative Dipeptides and an Efficient Method for Dipeptide Structure Determinations Based on Amino Acid Conformers.