Abstract:Research SummaryProtecting minority shareholders is a central issue in corporate governance. A common tool of empowering minority shareholders is to curb controlling shareholders’ power of expropriating firm value, but this approach was rarely successful because of the resistance from powerful controlling shareholders. We examine an alternative way of empowering minority shareholders without directly fighting with controlling shareholders. A major corporate governance reform in China gave minority shareholders a decision right over certain actions that affected the creation of firm value. We demonstrate that the greater the extent to which minority shareholders’ actions can influence the firm's value ex post, the more value controlling shareholders concede to minority shareholders ex ante. This effect becomes even stronger when controlling shareholders are able to expropriate a larger portion of firm value.Managerial SummaryMinority shareholders often have to contend with excessive extraction of firm value by powerful controlling shareholders, particularly in emerging markets. When this tension is considered as a zero‐sum game in which every gain to controlling shareholders has to come from a loss to minority shareholders, controlling shareholders strongly resist any effort to empower minority shareholders. We propose an alternative approach to empower minority shareholders. A major reform of Chinese listed firms bestowed on minority shareholders decision rights to take certain actions that could ex post create a larger “pie” (firm value) for all shareholders. We find that controlling shareholders give away greater value ex ante to minority shareholders to induce more of these actions. Consequentially, minority shareholders are more effectively empowered when they can affect firm value.

The threat of voiced shareholder disapproval and the value of voting

Shareholder Voting: A Complementary Mechanism to Mandatory Disclosure Regulation

Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments

Managerial Response Under Shareholder Empowerment: Evidence from Majority Voting Legislation Changes

Shareholder Monitoring through Voting: New Evidence from Proxy Contests

Minority shareholder voting and dividend policy

Uncertainty, Information, and Shareholder Democracy: Evidence from Voting on Shareholder Proposals

Trust and Shareholder Voting

The Shared Cost of Pursuing Shareholder Value

Effects of Shareholder Proposals on Corporate Governance and Firm Value: Focusing on Strengthening Shareholder Rights Following the Introduction of the Stewardship Code

An anti-takeover strategy by limitation of voting rights: A model and a numerical approach

Shareholder Activism on Climate Change: Evolution, Determinants, and Consequences

Does regulatory reform of cumulative voting promote a more balanced power distribution in the boardroom?

The effects of executive compensation and outside monitoring on firms’ pre-repurchase disclosure behavior and post-repurchase performance

Insider Stock Pledges and Shareholder Wealth

Shareholder's Voting Right: The Connecting Point between Corporate Ownership and Corporate Controlling

The effect of shareholder activism on earnings management: Evidence from shareholder proposals1

The Downside of Displaying Agentic Values: Evidence from Shareholder Activism

Empirical study on voting results and proxy advisor recommendations in Japan

Value Creation and Value Capture in Governing Shareholder Relationships: Evidence from a Policy Experiment in an Emerging Market

Blockholder exit threats and excess executive perks