Abstract:the past two decades, increasing the influence of common shareholders has become a touchstone of good governance and shareholder democracy across the globe. Institutional activism combined with major regulatory overhauls has led shareholders to play a more active role in corporate decision-making. Yet, there are only a handful of studies that examine the role of corporate governance on a CEO’s opportunity costs to sell her holdings. In this paper, we provide evidence that quality of governance helps to explain a significant amount of variation in CEO ownership and the compensation structure. We argue that exogenous improvements in governance standards reduce the CEO’s costs to sell her shares because the market puts a higher weight on liquidity-related sales relative to private information-related sales. We find that CEO ownership level is strongly negatively related to the quality of corporate governance. Further, we argue that higher liquidation of shareholdings lowers the CEO’s wealth-performance sensitivity; hence, the compensation committee needs to give more incentive compensation to keep the wealth-performance sensitivity at the optimal level. We find that CEO incentive intensity is positively associated with the quality of corporate governance. Thus, we find that CEOs get more stakes in the firm, but CEOs choose to hold a lower stake in their portfolio. We use the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (henceforth, SOX) as a quasi-natural experiment to mitigate the causality concern between corporate governance, CEO’s stick ownership, and compensation structure. As a robustness test, we check that CEOs, under good governance, have higher yearly share sales. This effect is positively related to CEOs' tenure and negatively related to the size of the firm. However, we show that even if they earn higher incentive compensation, CEOs with lower stock ownership have lower wealth-performance sensitivity compared to CEOs with higher stock ownership. Our results have important implications for contracting mechanisms related to mitigating agency problems.

Shareholder Voting: A Complementary Mechanism to Mandatory Disclosure Regulation

Equity Financing Incentive and Corporate Disclosure: New Causal Evidence from SEO Deregulation

The threat of voiced shareholder disapproval and the value of voting

Managerial Response Under Shareholder Empowerment: Evidence from Majority Voting Legislation Changes

Do Shareholder Ratification Votes Impact Subsequent Audit Outcomes?

Effects of Shareholder Proposals on Corporate Governance and Firm Value: Focusing on Strengthening Shareholder Rights Following the Introduction of the Stewardship Code

Shareholder Monitoring through Voting: New Evidence from Proxy Contests

The Role of Passive Investors in Corporate Governance and Socially Responsible Investing: Evidence from Shareholder Proposals

Multiple blockholders and governance through voice: evidence from blockholder board representation

Uncertainty, Information, and Shareholder Democracy: Evidence from Voting on Shareholder Proposals

Extracting transparency: the process of regulating disclosures for the resources industry

Do Specialized Board Committees Impact the Transparency of Corporate Political Disclosure? Evidence from S&P 500 Companies

Shareholder Composition, Corporate Governance and Their Monitoring Effects on Firm Performance

Minority shareholder voting and dividend policy

Does regulatory reform of cumulative voting promote a more balanced power distribution in the boardroom?

Quality of Governance, Opportunity Costs, and CEO Compensation Structure

The effects of executive compensation and outside monitoring on firms’ pre-repurchase disclosure behavior and post-repurchase performance

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: An Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure

Say-on-Pay Laws and Financial Reporting Quality Around the World: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Corporate Governance Reform and Executive Incentives: Implications for Investments and Risk Taking

Governance Quality in a 'Comply or Explain' Governance Disclosure Regime