Abstract:The UK Government is hosting COP26 in Glasgow between 31st October and 12th November 2021. It plans to make progress in four key areas which summarize as ‘coal, cars, cash and trees’ (Carbon Brief, 2021). The first two of these aims— to get agreement for the rapid phase out of coal, the most polluting of fossil fuels, and to ensure a rapid transition away for cars fuelled by fossil fuels— are very important, but are not directly related to the remit of Global Change Biology. The latter two aims— ensuring that the financial support of $100 billion per year promised in 2010 by wealthy countries to developing countries finally gets delivered and ensuring that climate solutions adopted also codeliver to nature— are squarely within the remit of Global Change Biology. With respect to the ‘cash’ aim, this flow of finance is essential to allow poorer countries to adapt to, and to mitigate, climate change. We know that a vast proportion of the potential for natural climate solutions is located in the developing world (Griscom et al., 2020), so if we are to realize that global potential, developing countries must have the financial backing to ensure that this happens in an equitable and just way. Not all of this cash will be used for naturebased solutions, of course, but a proportion of it will be, and naturebased solutions would almost certainly not happen at the scale and speed required to help us meet net zero greenhouse gas emissions targets without this cash. With respect to the ‘trees’ aim, the first thing to note is that naturebased solutions are about so much more than just planting trees (Seddon et al., 2021)! ‘Trees’ is just shorthand for naturebased solutions, but the broad variety of naturebased solutions available, beyond just tree planting, must be encouraged at COP26. The recent joint workshop report by IPBES and IPCC (Pörtner et al., 2021) demonstrated that we cannot successfully resolve either of the existential threats of climate change or biodiversity loss unless we tackle them both together. Mainstreaming nature into our thinking on climate action is essential, so encouraging all countries to include naturebased solutions in their nationally determined contributions to meet the goal of the Paris Agreement will be the first step in formalizing these considerations. But not all greenhouse gas removal options available on land or in the oceans constitute naturebased solutions— naturebased solutions must also provide benefits to human wellbeing and biodiversity— so the way in which they are implemented is crucial. Parties to the COP should be encouraged to adopt international guidelines for naturebased solutions, such as those provided by IUCN (2021), or those suggested by the NatureBased Solutions Initiative (NBSI, 2021), which are as follows: • Naturebased solutions are not a substitute for the rapid phaseout of fossil fuels and must not delay urgent action to decarbonize our economies. • Naturebased solutions involve the protection, restoration and/ or management of a wide range of natural and seminatural ecosystems on land and in the sea; the sustainable management of aquatic systems and working lands; or the creation of novel ecosystems in and around cities or across the wider landscape. • Naturebased solutions are designed, implemented, managed and monitored by or in partnership with Indigenous peoples and local communities through a process that fully respects and champions local rights and knowledge, and generates local benefits. • Naturebased solutions support or enhance biodiversity, that is, the diversity of life from the level of the gene to the level of the ecosystem.

COP29's climate investment imperative

COP29: Deal to raise $300bn a year by 2035 for poorer countries is hailed and slated

The Climate Cost of Climate Investment: A Two-Period Perspective

Why COP28 outcomes matter: insights on addressing climate change, fossil fuels, and global health resilience

Essential Outcomes for COP26

Policies for climate finance: Status and research needs

Adaptation: is securing funding really the top priority for COP negotiations?

Stocktaking global warming – the outcomes of the 2023 Dubai climate summit (COP28)

A global consumer-led strategy to tackle climate change

The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon?

Trump's shadow looms at climate summit: what COP29 could deliver

Implications of Earth system tipping pathways for climate change mitigation investment

Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?

Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

Scientists Warn That Paris Summit is Last Chance to Prevent Fatal Temperature Rise.

The Critical Role of Energy Transition in Addressing Climate Change at COP28

Disarmament is vital for climate justice and health

Decarbonizing the downturn: Addressing climate change in an age of stagnation

Accounting for finance is key for climate mitigation pathways

Timing Is Everything: How Economists Can Better Address the Urgency of Stronger Climate Policy

Global Climate Emergency: after COP24, climate science, urgency, and the threat to humanity