The Climate Cost of Climate Investment: A Two-Period Perspective

Shaunak Kulkarni,Rohan Ajay Dubey

2024-08-26

Abstract:A one-size-fits-all paradigm that only adapts the scale and immediate outcome of climate investment to economic circumstances will provide a short-lived, economically inadequate response to climate issues; given the limited resources allocated to green finance, it stands to reason that the shortcomings of this will be exacerbated by the fact that it comes at the cost of long-term, self-perpetuating, systemic solutions. Financial commitments that do not consider the capital structure of green finance in an economy will cumulatively dis-aggregate the economic cost of climate investment, to erode the competitive advantage of the most innovative economies, while simultaneously imposing the greatest financial burden on economies that are most vulnerable to the impact of climate change; such disaggregation will also leave 'middle' economies in a state of flux - honouring similar financial commitments to vulnerable or highly developed peers, but unable to generate comparable return, yet sufficiently insulated from the impact of extreme climate phenomena to not organically develop solutions. In the face of these changing realities, green innovation needs to expand beyond technology and address systemic inefficiencies - lack of clear responsibility, ambiguously defined commitments, and inadequate checks & balances to name a few. Clever application of financial engineering demonstrates promise, and simple measures like carbon-credit exchanges have been effective in mitigating imperfections at the grassroots level. We believe that information- and incentive-centric systemic advancements can usher a fresh wave of green innovation that stands on the shoulders of giants to ensure effective implementation of technological breakthroughs; economic development that will create an international community equipped with a robust framework to deal with long-term crises in a strategic manner.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issue this paper attempts to address is whether climate investment exhibits diminishing marginal returns and to assess the implications of this for climate action policies. Specifically, the study is divided into three parts:

1. **Assessing the relationship between the cumulative impact of climate investment and the state of economic development**:
- The study aims to understand the relationship between the cumulative impact of domestic climate investment and the state of economic development. By analyzing the Human Development Index (HDI) and the State Capacity Index (SCI), it explores their relationship with carbon productivity.

2. **Exploring the link between the cumulative impact of climate investment and the effect of additional investment**:
- The study further investigates the relationship between cumulative climate investment and the effect of additional investment. Through a two-stage framework analysis, it finds that developing countries have greater potential to improve carbon productivity, while developed countries face the issue of diminishing marginal returns.

3. **Discussing the potential climate impact of additional climate investment on the state of domestic economic development and its policy implications**:
- Finally, the paper discusses the potential climate impact of additional climate investment on countries with different levels of economic development and proposes corresponding policy recommendations. It suggests that developed countries should fund more climate actions in developing countries to achieve better overall benefits.

In summary, this paper aims to reveal, through empirical research, the marginal returns of climate investment in countries with different levels of economic development and to propose corresponding policy recommendations based on these findings.