Abstract:We study 944 shareholder proposals submitted to 343 U.S. firms on climate change issues during 2009–2022. We use logistic and two-stage regression to estimate the propensity for a firm to be targeted or subjected to a vote at the annual general meeting and, for voted proposals, the determinants of that vote. We also examine whether climate-related proposals affect investor returns and how they relate to firms' future environmental performance and greenhouse gas emissions. Compared to a matched sample, we first find that activists target larger, more carbon-intensive, and less R&D-active firms. Second, voting likelihood is higher for firms with repeated and operations-related proposals and lower pre-proposal environmental ratings. By contrast, disclosure-related proposals are likelier to be negotiated and withdrawn. Third, repeated and operations-related proposals receive higher votes in favor, whereas votes on carbon-intensive firms do not. Fourth, building on the theory that investors act as if they distinguish among the different shareholder proposals based on the expected cost to the firm, we find evidence to support this idea. We find that investors respond negatively to ex-ante costlier proposals, such as those that relate to emissions reduction and target carbon-intensive firms. Fifth, targets' future environmental performance rating is almost twenty percent higher after a proposal than before compared to the matched sample, whereas emissions do not budge appreciably.

Green innovation and shareholder litigation rights

Shareholder litigation risk, managerial risk aversion, redeployable assets, and sustainability: A quasi-natural experiment

Does shareholder litigation risk promote or hinder corporate social responsibility? A quasi‐natural experiment

Shareholder Litigation Rights and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from Derivative Lawsuits

Why Are Corporate Investment Horizons Shrinking? Uncovering the Spillover Effects of Shareholder Litigation

The Dark Side of Shareholder Litigation: Evidence from Corporate Takeovers

Theoretical Evidence for Green Innovation Driven by Multiple Major Shareholders: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

The effect of shareholder litigation rights on female board representation: A quasi-natural experiment

Costs may be a blessing in disguise: Litigation risk and greenwashing

Shareholder Litigation and Bank Risk

Short Sellers and Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

Good for the firm, good for the society? Causal evidence of the impact of equity incentives on a firm's green investment

Shareholder Activism on Climate Change: Evolution, Determinants, and Consequences

The role of Corporate Governance in the nexus between Litigation Risk and Corporate Innovation

How does directors' and officers' liability insurance affect green innovation? Evidence from China

Institutional Investors' Green Activism and Corporate Green Innovation: Based on the Behind-Scene Communications

Do green concerns promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from Chinese stock exchange interactive platforms

The Effect of Shareholder Litigation Risk on the Information Environment: The Case of Cross-Listed Firms

Green Investor Holdings and Corporate Green Technological Innovation

Corporate green innovation behaviour and investment efficiency: evidence from China

The impact of ESG ratings under market soft regulation on corporate green innovation: an empirical study from informal environmental governance