Abstract:This paper investigates the financial impact of corporate sustainability greenwashing in the global Technology sector. Using environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversy data spanning between 2014 and 2021, we examine how media-reported conflicts linking companies to dubious sustainability claims influence financing costs. Models estimate effects on weighted average cost of capital, cost of equity, and cost of debt, contrasting overall controversies around issues against strictly environmental cases. Further analysis discriminates between high and low systematic risk technology firms. Results reveal increased overall sustainability controversies are associated with lower equity financing expenses, indicating investors continue value growth prospects despite ethical concerns. However, strict environmental controversies increase all financing costs. Findings suggest visibility of environmental externalities is sufficiently tangible that greenwashing them backfires financially, unlike shadowy social conduct. Additionally, lower systematic risk firms suffer harsher greenwashing penalties, implying resilience to disruption reduces misleading incentives. Transparency is currently inadequate immunisation against greenwashing in the Technology sector, necessitating oversight reforms. Stricter auditing and disclosure requirements would enable investors to accurately price sustainability risk and channel funds toward authentic sustainability transformation. Moreover, Technology companies must credibly convey environmental progress to avoid value destruction from questionable claims. Accordingly, managers should proactively invest in sustainability to mitigate reputation risks and access financing at lower costs. Ultimately, multifaceted transparency and coordinated policy responses are essential to realize genuine sustainability in disruptive, high-impact technologies.

Costs may be a blessing in disguise: Litigation risk and greenwashing

Litigation risk and corporate philanthropy: A managerial perspective analysis

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

How does directors' and officers' liability insurance affect green innovation? Evidence from China

Navigating legal responsibilities in politically connected firms: Insights into the influence of directors' and officers' insurance on litigation risk

Directors' and officers' liability insurance and carbon emissions

Directors' and officers' liability insurance and corporate environmental investment: empirical evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms

Green innovation and shareholder litigation rights

Directors' and officers' liability insurance, environmental regulation and firms' envi ronmental responsibility

Cost of debt financing, stock returns, and corporate strategic ESG disclosure: Evidence from China

The impact of subscribing to directors' and officers' liability insurance on corporate financialization: Evidence from China

Corporate ESG performance and litigation risk-based on ESG lawsuits of listed firms in China

Seeing through the haze: greenwashing and the cost of capital in technology firms

Financial constraints and corporate greenwashing strategies in China

Are firms motivated to greenwash by financial constraints? Evidence from global firms' data

ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China

Impact of "environmental disclosure greenwashing": a study from the perspective of heterogeneous environmental policies

Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance and Corporate Green Innovation

Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration

Executive pay gap and corporate ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China

Social media attention and corporate greenwashing: Evidence from China